Ice Cream Mafia - Night 2 (11/14)

childe (3): tutuu, Leafia, jail
jail (2): Chomps, Zone_Q11

Not Voting (7): childe, Frostwolf103, Magnus, potatocat, Camilleon15, Creature, I_like_posts

VOTE: jail

1 Like

europeans wake up :bangbang::bangbang::bangbang::bangbang::bangbang:

1 Like

I peeked Creature vanilla and Magnus not vanilla. I typed a post about not finding the case on Hippo convincing tbh. I never finished it which is for the best.

Villagery

Tutuu
Zone
Creature
Frost
Leafia
Jail
Camilleon
ILP
Childe
Chomps
Magnus

Wolfy

I outright missed the section of Hippo’s ISO where he tried swaying dissent against me specifically. This wasn’t realistically with the aim of getting me executed, but it might’ve helped to discredit Chomps’ wagon at the time and emphasised minor doubt in the minds of his opponents. Hippo was frustrated that nobody was responding to him, hence why he shut down near EOD until he very nearly lived. Voting me with several long hours before EOD could also readily explain the unwillingness to self-preserve with a vote against Chomps; it wasn’t a double bait or else you’d probably vote Chomps early, then unvote later to create a “tangible” bind between you both. With this in mind, the connection between Chomps and Hippo looks bad. Wagons could’ve been W/W.

Summary
1 Like

If this was a scripted theatre arrangement Hippo would’ve had a more direct reaction planned, I’d have expected — or at least something ready to share. This line is so acceding it reads the opposite, like Hippo didn’t want to risk clarifying one way or another whether they could be paired or not. It’s overly vague without the puppet convection you’d expect.

. . .
@jail @Chomps
What checks did you have if you were Neapolitan?

1 Like
Zone_Q11 Jail Childe
Frostwolf Leafia Magnus
Potato Camilleon Creature
Tutuu <3Posts Chomps
(Slots whose interactions I think look good or bad with the hindsight of Hippo’s flip, of those I’ve checked.)

Jail and <3Posts interaction at the latter’s queries in (#327) is outwardly curious. It’s passive questioning followed by a loose townlean and then random questioning about Chomps’ slot. The follow-up post is written like a defence for Leafia, but this post itself feels the opposite.

Jail does vote Chomps later, but by that time it’s a bad situation all around if they’re evil: vote Hippo late and look opportunistic, vote Chomps and act defending. The latter feels more credit-affirming if Chomps is evil, but if town… I mean, there’s not really any good way out here. Jail certainly did feel frustrated over this…

The stumble over unvoting Chomps and then backstepping as soon Eliza voted, as though realising “wait I might want to be on this” is spectacular, though. In fact, Jail just wanted credit overall — this sequence is super bizarre otherwise. This was really the only outcome where Jail could jump onto Hippo’s wagon and warrant any positive attention out of it, hypothetically speaking.

Summary
1 Like

VOTE: Jail.
This is just the voice I’m choosing to steal for the moment, don’t mind me.

I’ll post later at eod it does support my current thoughts

Im cop since town wants to make themselves lose the game

Im not claiming my check until everyone claims what flavor they picked

Mhmmm, no you’re not. The flavour claims were already publicly sorted yesterday, and even if it was ambiguous or a specific check didn’t clarify, that only matters if it was a redcheck.

Dont get all pretentious with me i will close the app and that will be your own fault if you’re town lol

How laughable. (Futile.)
We already planned to only have five people be Chocolate. If you are truly Cop and…

  • …had a greencheck, then you would’ve already revealed it by now.
  • …had a redcheck, then it has to be someone outside [Zone, Leafia, tutuu, potatocat].
    • If you checked one of those four, then you lose credibilty of being Cop due to lack of reading comprehension.
    • If you checked someone outside the four, then you should have already pointed it out by now instead of “trying to figure out why they derailed from the plan”. (Anyone who derails from the plan dies (faster), period.)
1 Like

potatocat is non vanilla

Pretentiousness is the act of evoking the claim of more significance than is warranted. I’m not attempting to hurt you, and I apologise if it was interpreted as such.

I can finally say this:
Death sentence!

@childe
@Frostwolf103
@Leafia
@potatocat
@Camilleon15
@Creature
@tutuu
@I_like_posts
@Chomps

Technically it’s now optimal to kill somebody else.

do you enjoy talking in a way that is bound to make people mad at you? just wondering

always had been