I peeked Creature vanilla and Magnus not vanilla. I typed a post about not finding the case on Hippo convincing tbh. I never finished it which is for the best.
Villagery
Tutuu
Zone
Creature
Frost
Leafia
Jail
Camilleon
ILP
Childe
Chomps
Magnus
Wolfy
I outright missed the section of Hippo’s ISO where he tried swaying dissent against me specifically. This wasn’t realistically with the aim of getting me executed, but it might’ve helped to discredit Chomps’ wagon at the time and emphasised minor doubt in the minds of his opponents. Hippo was frustrated that nobody was responding to him, hence why he shut down near EOD until he very nearly lived. Voting me with several long hours before EOD could also readily explain the unwillingness to self-preserve with a vote against Chomps; it wasn’t a double bait or else you’d probably vote Chomps early, then unvote later to create a “tangible” bind between you both. With this in mind, the connection between Chomps and Hippo looks bad. Wagons could’ve been W/W.
If this was a scripted theatre arrangement Hippo would’ve had a more direct reaction planned, I’d have expected — or at least something ready to share. This line is so acceding it reads the opposite, like Hippo didn’t want to risk clarifying one way or another whether they could be paired or not. It’s overly vague without the puppet convection you’d expect.
| Zone_Q11 | Jail | Childe |
| Frostwolf | Leafia | Magnus |
| Potato | Camilleon | Creature |
| Tutuu | <3Posts | Chomps |
Jail and <3Posts interaction at the latter’s queries in (#327) is outwardly curious. It’s passive questioning followed by a loose townlean and then random questioning about Chomps’ slot. The follow-up post is written like a defence for Leafia, but this post itself feels the opposite.
Jail does vote Chomps later, but by that time it’s a bad situation all around if they’re evil: vote Hippo late and look opportunistic, vote Chomps and act defending. The latter feels more credit-affirming if Chomps is evil, but if town… I mean, there’s not really any good way out here. Jail certainly did feel frustrated over this…
The stumble over unvoting Chomps and then backstepping as soon Eliza voted, as though realising “wait I might want to be on this” is spectacular, though. In fact, Jail just wanted credit overall — this sequence is super bizarre otherwise. This was really the only outcome where Jail could jump onto Hippo’s wagon and warrant any positive attention out of it, hypothetically speaking.
VOTE: Jail.
This is just the voice I’m choosing to steal for the moment, don’t mind me.
I’ll post later at eod it does support my current thoughts
Im cop since town wants to make themselves lose the game
Im not claiming my check until everyone claims what flavor they picked
Mhmmm, no you’re not. The flavour claims were already publicly sorted yesterday, and even if it was ambiguous or a specific check didn’t clarify, that only matters if it was a redcheck.
Dont get all pretentious with me i will close the app and that will be your own fault if you’re town lol
How laughable. (Futile.)
We already planned to only have five people be Chocolate. If you are truly Cop and…
potatocat is non vanilla
Pretentiousness is the act of evoking the claim of more significance than is warranted. I’m not attempting to hurt you, and I apologise if it was interpreted as such.
I can finally say this:
Death sentence!
@childe
@Frostwolf103
@Leafia
@potatocat
@Camilleon15
@Creature
@tutuu
@I_like_posts
@Chomps
Technically it’s now optimal to kill somebody else.
do you enjoy talking in a way that is bound to make people mad at you? just wondering
always had been
No. We are not letting an outed wolf live.
It sucks for both parties. Town would have to keep a +1 outed threat alive, while Mafia would have to continue lolcatting like Hippo did.
Just end his suffering after a short discussion about jail’s spew. (I am not planning to spend more than 24 hours “discussing” when I know everyone’s plan is to stay silent until EOD.)
No. This is me being polite.
I may not be as vulgar as Bruno from SC2Mafia, but truthfully speaking I wish to speak more profanity. Not that it will happen though, as it would be against the first global rule.