bobbi
i dmed willow with predictions before sonic 3 and when i came out with âeggman is bisexualâ ticked off i felt like i had won the world
Heheheh
this the typa shit I was on in 2023
2021 too. 2022 was kinda a nothing year in hindsight
actually nah 2022 also.
Progress Report
Focusing on Column 3 of Box 1, it should not have any [3] in it since the only way Nabner works in Box 1 if such is the case would be if it was paired with a [1] in Column 3, which breaks C3R4.
That means that the Nabner in Box 1 Column 3 contains [1,2], [4], [8,9] (and the [6] from Box 2).
[4] in Column 3 forces [4] in Box 4 to be in Row 4. This eliminates [4] from C7R4.
Since we know the Nabner in Box 2 contains a [9], it is either in C5R3 or C6R3. This eliminates the possibility of the Nabner in Box 3 of containing a [9].
([9] cannot be put in C7R4 either since doing so would eliminate any room for [9] in Box 3 by means of Sudoku, Anti-Quad, and Nabner.)
Fill in C7R3.
Canât be [1,2] 'cuz of Anti-Quad.
Canât be [5,7] 'cuz of Box 1 Row 3.
Canât be [6] 'cuz of C4R3.
Canât be [8] 'cuz the Nabner around it would break otherwise.
Canât be [9] 'cuz of the paragraph above.
That leaves [3,4] for C7R3.
Where is [8] in Row 3? If you followed the steps above, then you should only be able to put it in C3, C8, or C9, with the latter two being part of the Nabner line of Box 3.
If you put [8] in C3R3, then the Nabner line of Box 3 would have to put another [8] in C7R4. But this breaks Box 4 because thereâd be no room for [8] there because of the Anti-Quad.
Therefore, [8] is in the Nabner line of Box 3.
Which eliminates [8] from C7R4, turning it into a definite [2].
âŠthe rest is getting too long to explain.
This ought to be enough for a progress report.
I have yet to solve the puzzle.
Solved. 75:45+
(I forgot to unpause around the 54 minute mark, and I forgot how long I stared at the puzzle.)
Oh no itâs doomed.
no idea why i missed the notif but I agree. that line was the best line. and yeah it does a horrible job of highlighting the bad parts of wealth disparity. ârich people go to expensive restaurant. Some of them behave badly and some dont but all of them dieâ. Itâs like somebody who was asleep during a binge of white lotus trying and failing to describe the plot back to you
Note to self: Strawberry smoothie (purĂ©ed in blender) tastes good if mixed with milk in a 1:1 or 3:2 ratio. It doesnât taste too sweet, which -considering I donât like that aspect of strawberries- is amazing!
Im bulking up in the gym!!!
okay so maybe youâll get to like half a loaf by next year
Iâll take it
Iâm having trouble articulating this point, but I felt like there was incoherency in its actual message. Like okay it hates the inauthenticity and lack of heart and pretentiousness of fine dining or whatever, but John Leguizamo is there because he made slock I guess? Like it wants the victims besides Anya Taylor-Joy to seem somehow deserving, but also what the fuck is a cheeseburger if not slock? He kills a guy for making the cheeseburger equivalent of films, but the making of a cheeseburger is what the text seems to lionize. I could be misremembering Leguizamoâs sins here, but I have never been able to actually pinpoint what it was trying to say beyond just this vague resentment at âelitismâ or whatever.
no it was literally just âyou are a washed up actor taking slop movie scriptsâ. Like he is supposed to be a Liar as well but thatâs not why the chef gives a shit. I mean you are fully right, the movie is just anti-intellectualism. âactually le burger is better than michelin restaurantâ is kinda the point of the movie. Which conviently ignores the insane levels of cash-grabbing and abuse and pain that go into making the burger as well but the movie isnât even close to any level of coherency for me to expect that
Yeah like some of the sins boiled down to just kind of being unlikeable which I feel like is not what Iâm supposed to be taking away lol