or you have that guy lol
i should kill people who annoy me
which would increase cost but surely thatāll come from executive compensation and curb stock buybacks instead of being passed on to the consumer, right? and for the record, I donāt think itāll turbocharge the job market, but even if it did, I donāt think itāll actually decrease costs.
my friends did, then I explained in-depth why that wouldnt happen, so it pivoted to āwell everyone gets richer anyways because of jobsā
canāt wait for your friends to go work minimum wage jobs in agriculture to āget richerā
average mormon when presented with evidence
their parents live in mansions lol. they will not have to ever worry about working to survive. its a different world
its hard to really even call them friends anymore, i can live with idiotic right wing economic takes because you dont have to understand the economy well to be my friend, but you do have to respect women and minorities which has increasingly been not happening. buh
no one wants to go work jobs that involve long days of monotonous physical labor outdoors. those are a lot of the jobs that migrant workers take. i seriously doubt itāll create a lot of desirable, well-paying jobs. but yeah your friends arenāt going to be materially affected whatsoever. the only policy that matters to them is daddy getting a big enough tax cut to justify giving johnny failson a bigger coke allowance
heard lol
i mean they arent that type of rich kid. its very much āim going to meet a woman with hopefully no discernible personality, and start a Good, Catholic family by being the only breadwinner in my family*ā
*conveniently subsidized by your hollywood father
great. love it. men are definitely not trash.
totally
there are good men lol they just donāt typically go to st michaels motherfucking catholic academy
again, handpicked by joe rogan (and hundreds of other fathers) who want their kids to live in a bubble where the ideas of 1960 america are still possible.
yeah but i maintain good men know iām not talking about them and understand exactly who iām talking about.
and there are still men who are fine who went there, i dont really fw the over generalization
Yeah p much
this assumption is what lost the 18-29 m demographic lol
i live in utah so usually when i say something like āthe mormons blah blah blahā or ācishet boysā or something like that itās because the demographics in my area are such that on average if i look at a random guy who (looks like, since i canāt tell for sure, but like. yāknow. Utah) a cishet white boy i can make two assumptions with like 80% accuracy:
- heās a Mormon
- he is completely insufferable as a result of either the mormonism or being a far-right maniac (n shit like that)
and so i end up just avoiding talking to people who meet that description. well, i avoid talking to everyone i randomly spot in public, but thereās no way in hell i would do it for those guys especially
admittedly, this has lead to some noticable, like, āpeople boxesā thinking when reasonable people who just happen to be cishet white boys do actually talk to me, and this is also just a utah-demographics-specific thing so
also im more careful about my language when im with people who i know i would need to or could āpersuadeā or otherwise influence so