da, its not in the list
i double checked cause you.said that
oh fair
idk if i were reviewing a game and i had literally just “MU’s pr killer from that one champs setup” in it
then id probably still consider that vanilla
depending on the rest of the setup ofc
u could just accept that ur game is Not Vanilla and not try to run it as such
1 Like
But…
Vanilla games contain only vanilla roles , standard night cycles, and have no bastard mechanics (with a few exceptions such as Godfathers, if their existence is made known).
“No bastard mechanics.”
Anti-claim mechanic is not bastard, is it?
1 Like
Did that. Got bored of it.
I don’t even want Vanilla. I want Standard, which is just a Closed Vanilla.
1 Like
oh i wouldn’t recategorize a standard game just for having an anticlaim
depending on what the rest of it is tho
1 Like
Perfect.
1 Like
im pulling the “I couldn’t possibly judge a case that is not before me… BUT”
by a TECHNICAL DEFINITION the “only vanilla roles”" would technically disqualify it, if its assigned to a role
however this is obviously stupid
…? Wdym.
DEPENDING ON THE COMPLEXITY OF THE ANTICLAIM it might slightly disqualify it
but like
if its a
“1-shot claim vanillizer”
yeah I’m ok with that
1 Like
“no bastard mechanics” is not an entirely excluding statement, and everything else is allowed
there are several roles which are debatably non-bastard which also are not allowed, and with good reason (i.e, roles that break forum rules)
1 Like
also what i was saying here is that
by an extremely strict reading factional anticlaims are allowed but role anticlaims arent
needless to say this is stupid
if you can pass it through a reviewer and they find it fine its okay, but by my perceived image they’d be banned
1 Like
Once again: Perfect.
1 Like
i would also be ok if it was a 1-shot PR killer as outlined above
at least in terms of categorization
if it doesnt fit in the setup ill still change it