About the Rules & Moderation category (Part 1)

YOU MUST PLAY MAHJONG. NO SEX

2 Likes

also isn’t she surrounded by water. how are you gonna burn anything.

1 Like

someone, somewhere, has been told these exact words in a serious context

1 Like

yeah and it’s you right now

3 Likes

The girl said she was around collar person and their new partner and heard them talk about their relationship with me a bit, and that she wouldn’t tell me what they said about it, because “it would just make you feel worse, maybe in a while”, and then after some time described it as “[opening box labeled relationship] Affection? Why’s there affection in here?”

1 Like

aliens discovering the concept of affection

I should’ve maybe tried to convince her to tell me because I love information but I didn’t want to seem like na ass

1 Like

well now you have to try to get with the girl. for the bit

1 Like

or you have to describe your relationship with collar person in the periphery of someone who’ll report it back to them

Okay first of all she pays way more attention to what I’m doing than anybody else I know so it’d be hard to blog while with her without her noticing. She already noticed me making the comment about “gay types” in the FoLermon thread and asked

So I feel like it’d be disappointing for you. If that’s not a dealbreaker I can still try

If you help me prove my integrals go to 0 I’ll do whatever you want for the bit

You can also see the two cutouts on each side cancel out by symmetry but I need something better than “proof by desmos” hall and oates | Desmos

unfortunately i don’t actually know math

1 Like

wdym someone who you constantly have to explain fol to seems ideal

1 Like

absolute value of the integral being less than or equal to the integral of the absolute value seems like a straightforward consequence of the triangle inequality

1 Like

or norm i guess. is the word. i’m too real analysis brained

1 Like

your best bet is probably representing cot as cos/sin and figuring out a bound for that

1 Like

so complex cot(z) should just be i[e^(iz) + e^(-iz)]/[e^(iz) - e^(-iz)]

how to proceed from there is left as an exercise to the reader

1 Like

ok i found this online this is probably more useful
image

1 Like