Ah. Thanks for letting me know.
Wow⌠Your character was the town siding neut but it seems you were just using me. F
1 Like
Told you so
Anon wasnât townsiding Kiiruma.
1 Like
The neut character is a townsiding neut.
It literally was anticlaim which mafia would lie about their character more than town usually.
The way Anon was handling it wasnât necessarily townsiding.
If I had that character honestly Iâd probably full claim D1.
Just make a funny bit with somebody about you both being rolecops and then kill anyone who bites.
I thought about full claiming as it was definitely optimal but I felt it was a bit disingenuous to mafia to do so as they could not anti-claim me as I wasnât town so it felt mean. Plus playing neutral is quite rare and I wanted to experience it.
I was mostly townsiding though, I was rolefishing people to literally fake claim, not true claim, hence why I asked people roles of people I scumread.
2 Likes
Ok tbf thats fair reasoning. I was also on the boat of âwhy not just open claim and play for townâ
Very noble
1 Like
Kiiruma, what he was doing was not helpful to the town in the slightest.
1 Like
the role was designed to townside, kii says
goose did not townside
1 Like
Rolefishing is hard wolfsiding and if I had gotten the role, I believe I mentioned how I wouldâve handled it.
I donât care what it was designed to do. I care about what the player with it did.
Thatâs the difference.
Iâm saying what it was designed to do smh.
I will admit that it was likely designed with that in mind at least.
Iâd rather trust the town killing than the anti-claim vigilante that is self-interested.
(Then again, town killing can be impulsive as well)
Is that town killing named SirDerpsAlot?
( I have history of impulsive killing as town killing before )
2 Likes
Same here. Especially when the neut killing is wolfsiding.