April Showers The Third - DAY 4 (10/16)

[Chomps]

beacuse im your friend :)

[Host_Account_1]

@SMILEY

[carbonated]

mine eyes

[carbonated]

i will backread when:

• i don’t have a pset due

• i don’t have applications due

• i do not have two projects to do

[pandora]

good morning chat

[pandora]

@Rhea

@pandora, I have investigative information on your visit last night. Please claim your target and I will confirm it to the thread.

I visited multiple targets. heiter, jarek, marluna. My task was to see the number of visits among the three. I saw two.

[pandora]

@Creature

A bunch of wolfies executed our alignment cop D1.

that was not a cop ability

[pandora]

@Host_Account_1

Once per game at night phase, you may target another player and inform them that they have been investigated as [their own alignment].

you don’t see rhe allignment you inform them of their own allignment. for some reason

[Rhea]

@pandora

I visited multiple targets. heiter, jarek, marluna. My task was to see the number of visits among the three. I saw two.

Thank you.

I can neither confirm nor deny this.

[Rhea]

@pandora

you don’t see rhe allignment you inform them of their own allignment. for some reason

It can be easily exploited by a socially competent player to incriminate or clear others, though.

[Rhea]

Apologies for making you claim your role in a way that is vulnerable to anti-claim when I cannot actually definitively confirm your visits. I had only intended for you to claim your targets, not which actions you performed.

[Leafia]

True. It can. Today has been a long and tiring day for me too so good night everyone.

[soweli]

hi meow i also have hw

no n1 is kind of based to be honest gg town

[soweli]

hey guys do you think

[soweli]

nvm ignore that post

[pandora]

@Rhea

Apologies for making you claim your role in a way that is vulnerable to anti-claim when I cannot actually definitively confirm your visits. I had only intended for you to claim your targets, not which actions you performed.

I think i’m fine

[Rhea]

Well, if you all are not going to do anything in particular on your own, I suppose I must lead.

VOTE: Heiter.

I believe this is the clear correct vote for the time being. Fundamentally, these two feel uncomfortable in the thread in a way that shows a clear sense of wolfy performance, and their lack of a vote even into the end of the day comes across as a set of players who did not particularly care about the day’s outcome. Unless anything substantially changes with this slot, I cannot see them as town.

[Kiiruma]

I’m going to make one statement.
Unlike how most players might think, I am genuinely so sad that nobody died in the night.
Why couldn’t one of you had been killed?

And wtf is this whole weird grey character situation.

[Rhea]

Specifically, taking a look at their posts so far, the two of them both have a strong sense of awkwardness and announcement in their comings-and-goings. They spend much more time introducing themselves and explaining arrivals and departure than they do providing any thoughts, any content at all, and the content that they do provide is not in the form of naturally-flowing thoughts on players’ alignments, only speaking anything substantial in one clearly pre-meditated wall-post.

In that post, they give this townread on me:

@Heiter

Very comfortably made wallpost - every thought seems to be believed in, not much fat. At least from my experience players who make walls as scum generally do it for one of two reasons - appearing as if theyre contributing, in which case theres alot of fat/fluff, or to try and shift the thread towards a certain point of view in which case there will be significant focus on building a reality where a player/group of players are all scum. This post does neither of those. I agree with alot of the thoughts present, at least the ones I’ve uh. Seen the players to process. I disagree on some of the soweli posts though - to me they seem more like trying to take control of the game flow early for personal use rather than as a team exercise. Good post. +2

I skimmed over it when it was first posted, but on a re-read, this paragraph pings me strongly. There is no sense of nervousness around a strong player and there is no sense of genuine feeling to it. It is intellectualized, it is explained. It is appeasement of a type.

The only other game-related posts in Heiter’s history are provided by Ishmael, and they are not alignment-related. They speak about Leafia’s habits or the state of the wagons, thoughts that one does not need to be a villager to provide. This pattern of engagement (natural thoughts about non-alignment-related matters which a wolf could have and formalized, unnatural thoughts about alignments) is something I find to be heavily indicative of a wolf.

[Rhea]

I shall also disclose what provoked me to have this read so suddenly and strongly: at the end of the night, I was added to a neighborhood including Heiter. I joined the Discord server about forty minutes after the hour and Story (if I am not mistaken regarding identities) responded within three minutes with a casual tone that felt completely absent in the thread. The difference in comfort was striking and caused me to give a re-read of Heiter’s posts, which upon close reading felt extremely wolfy.