Again?
D3 Votecount
Willow (3): Leafia, Chomps, Canping
Frostwolf103 (1): Jarek
Kiiruma (1): Frostwolf103
Not Voting (8): Rhea, pandora, Kiiruma, Marluna, carbonated, soweli, SMILEY, ElizaThePsycho
Alright. What I think is happening is there seems to be a neutral (or evil) graverobber sorta thing.
For anybody in Heiterâs old neighbourhood genuinely need to ask if anybody has recently joined it.
If thereâs anybody new in there push on them please. We need to expose this role. Especially since if they ARE a graverobber, theyâve just stolen an anticlaim ability to use
Oh yeah I see, but this is a anticlaim that works on claiming false things
And we want that⌠why?
I looked at Heiterâs role, right?
That is the rule of that role.
Again. Why do we want someone who is probably anti town to have any sort of anticlaim?
Even if itâs anti fakeclaim its dangerous.
I donât know, I havenât thinked of this far.
Jarek already claimed he is responsible for it.
VOTE: Willow
(That is to Chomps)
(And used to send messages to other players.)
What about Jarek?
Just cuz he was roleblocked N1, it doesnât mean he canât be mafia.
I believe that Chomps is saying he doesnât have any kind of private communications, Carbonated is the player that got cut off from neighborhood Day 2, Chomps found only one and Jarek is on that list too
To be fair I am doubting the mafia chat counts as a neighbourhood. So all this tells us is that some people are in a hood and some people arenât.
Being in a hood is not inherently alignment indicative.
Iâm in no hood. But that in itself doesnât make me good or evil.
Creature has clear indication correct.
Chomps claimed he counts mafia chat as well.
He also says one chat at a time