i don’t think i can explain it any more than i have.
i can bring up my early-game issues too, though
i don’t know who the third person you are referring to is, but my post was theorizing a world where seth and arete are v/v and may’s vote on arete while they were going at each other is coming from a wolf capitalizing on this engagement while handing the responsibility to seth (“I agree with Zorvo)”, mainly due to its timing and the underlying implication that may actually cared about seth’s reasoning, which i struggle to see her caring about?
and then today
my “re-evaluation read” is that may is probably a wolf because i think they were playing with an agenda yesterday. they spend most of the day doing nothing of value and turn up just before eod (where they are still a wagon) to start doing stuff. i think their vote on me was opportunistic because when the wagons are v/v, wolves very often want to kill the non-poe’d villager because people will still want to resolve the original target (eliza) the next day, but not necessarily vice-versa
the reasoning they gave for voting me was bad because they described my flip as being informative despite me being one of the least talked about players in the game and eliza being one of the most talked about. and other than that they gave no indication of actually thinking i was a wolf, so their only reason being for information just seems like bullshit to justify a vote on the spicy wagon
the alternative i’m thinking about is that how if i follow my social read on Arete and the gamestate, May is probably just a wolf
consider how it makes sense for May to be masterminding the world where the three of me, you and Arete are villagers, and none of us are being nightkilled. i called it out on day 1, but i dropped it after i misread magnus for similar reasoning, but it holds that they’ve been egging on your (at least one incorrect) pushes since day 1
i think they’ve had two wolfy eods. i think they’ve been taking a backseat for most of the game while villagers kill each other and she’s never practically acted on any of her strong convictions in an impactful way. it doesn’t look like she’s trying to solve the game - it looks like she is playing in a calculated way to capitalize on whatever opportunity comes up, whether it be me at eod or Arete now and i don’t think her justification of voting me because my flip would be informative holds when i’ve been a hardly-discussed yet townread slot for the entire game. like, that’s the opposite of the sort of slot you want to kill for information, and they didn’t respond to my question about it either so i have to just take it at face value.
i just don’t think it makes sense to say the villager miseliminations were town-led if you suspect arete (someone leading these miseliminations)
it’s a gamestate read that fits with my social reads
but it’s also just… the way she’s been traversing the game feels like it has an agenda rather than being free-flowey. like there’s always an ulterior motive for what she does next and it feels calculated. the best thing i have to contradict this is her treatment of jarek but even that read ended up being a mess because it kinda just phased out of existence / got the “it was an RT all along” treatment
it just feels like everything she does is calculated
like i thought it could have been a “cards close to your chest” sort of playstyle like how eevee plays, but i felt like she was infinitely more transparent with her process in starcraft from the parts that i read