no i forgot about that 
Sorry, but executions are the only power town has, especially in this game. voting not to use it only benefits mafia. Why would you ever vote no exe as town? I donât understand.
1 Like
because society
back in the day i knew a guy called BlueLance who refused to execute unless town PRs gave info
(the only info PR was tracker)
Explanation for vanity vote is that I was in the thread like twenty, forty minutes to EoD, maintaining my nonsense vote on Jarek (I think Jarek is probably town, their reaction to it seemed townie, I just know Jarek as a player whoâs quite skilled when they work under pressure, so I wanted to provide some of that).
I fully intended to make an actual judgement on an actual wagon later. And then suddenly I wake up and itâs past EoD already. This was confusing to me at the time, and now I know why (I am sick).
Bad vote bad move I wouldnât have made it were I in complete control of my actions and it was antitown. But unfortunately there are problems syndromes about and those 20-40 minutes were simply not mine to play mafia with
admittedly this no-exe vote is out-of-character from what I know of aleph so i get that
but you donât know aleph
so
can you explain your thought process in more detail here
Like when you saw the post voting me that you didnât like, what did you think
also (separate question) what is your read on me 
1 Like
Voting to not execute anyone gives a 0% chance to execute wolf while wolf have a 100% chance to kill town. voting to execute gives a flat percent chance to execute wolf no matter who it is, while wolf still has a 100% chance to kill town. voting not to execute is just objectively incorrect as town. itâs not making an effort to find wolf at all. I can know antitown play without knowing the player
Shorter so i dont quit reading part way?
is
thus, itâs antitown behavior
or to put it another way: Wolves will always kill townies. Townies will not always kill wolves, but always has a chance to. if we want to win, we have to keep taking that chance, so not executing is objectively incorrect.
can you walk me through your thought process for thinking itâs specifically mafia-indicative, as opposed to being a really bad play from a villager? (tbc Iâm mainly asking this to figure out your alignment)
mainly I thought that this logic was fairly self-evident, so anyone actually taking the no exe option has gotta be maf. after explaining it twice iâm not so sure anymore, since yâall donât necessarily think the same way
I definitely agree with âno-exeing badâ and âpeople should realize that no-exeing is badâ Iâm just not confident in âtherefore only mafia would suggest to no-exeâ
2 Likes
i felt like it was litearlly just sheeping zorvo for no good reason
ehhhh
i feel like youâve kind of been trying to push people into making reads rather than actually making reads
whether or not this is mafia-indicative or not is another question
neither am I, anymore
1 Like
why not both
reason I ask is that youâve been making reads that semi-rely on me being town without really expressing anything like that
1 Like
as in
both pushing people into making reads and making reads
i have?
shading Otter for sheeping Zorvo onto me only makes sense if you think Iâm a villager! (or I guess if you think itâs a really incompetent bus)
+ you said you expected me to die overnight, and that the Neon kill is probably Zorvoâs fault, implying that either you think Zorvo is a wolf who pushed for a weird nightkill, or that Zorvo is being kept alive to tunnel me (I was pretty sure you meant the second one based on the fact that you didnât seem to be pushing Zorvo)