But we’re looking at 2 individual incidents, 2 individual possibilities. Not a collective. Since we, ourselves, do not know Jake’s own alignment. And Jake is biased to claim Good
No, but Jake knows his own alignment. So the alignment of the other Traveller is still just 50-50.
From his viewpoint
Granted, but if there is a probability that at least one traveler is evil, and you (me) know that I’m Good, then there’s a Higher probability that Mountain X is Evil (Since you [again, me] don’t need to account for both the odds of evil traveler existing and, importantly, it being a specific player)
your explaining this like it’s rng
1 Like
The chance of 2 individual possibilities happening is equal.
IIRC it’s like 2:1 Town:Minion team
So the odds of each of you being town individually is 67% (rounded)
If we were looking at collective then it’d be 4/9, about 44.4%
1 Like
i’m not sure if these hosts are running it this way but iirc in XII the storytellers chose it to help with balance?
could be mistaken though
1 Like
To be fair, there is a chance that the hosts decided which players got which roles
1 Like
In any case, Mountain X needa die because if there’s an evil traveler, it’s them.
Would it be angleshooting to consider which Demons and Minions share the strongest synergy with either Deviant or Barista, and use that to judge their alignments?
No not really
No deminion has synergy with Deviant, unless it’s like… anti-synergy
But it likely wasn’t accounted for
tnaiveD - if another player is funny today, kill them
1 Like
wouldn’t it be if another player isn’t funny
well if the deviant isn’t funny they pewish anyway owo
Are you the court jester, Mistyx?
Misty, you are being god awful. Please start churning out dead memes from 4chan in 2011
yeah this is for stealing deviant
The fact that Mist stole deviant and isn’t doing it justice is MUCH funnier.