That’s not what I asked you.
I asked you if you believed it was correct that all numbers between 1 and 20 have a real square root and you said no.
You are either wrong or mistaken.
I never said that once
1 Like
You are attempting to twist my words
1 Like
In the context that I had said it, what I said makes complete sense
1 Like
This was your response to my asking of that very question. Please stop trying to deny your own words.
The context hasn’t changed, you’re just trying not to admit that you’re either lying or mistaken.
My apologies
You worded it so strangely that I thought you were asking if none of them had it,
This fact changes nothing
1 Like
Remind me how a number between 1-20 having a valid square root changes anything
1 Like
Do you think that I could have worded it better?
Do you think it’s a fact that there are several different ways to word things to make them clearer?
Why do you think that nothing can change as a result of you being mistaken?
I think that answering your questions has nothing to do with what we’re discussing
if you were to argue that -666 is equal to one of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 , 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20, which one of them is it
1 Like
Do you think that answering some related questions will help us discuss bigger issues than this?
This isn’t relephant to what we’re discussing, are you even paying attention?
It is
May I remind you, your claim is
We’re not talking about that now, we’re talking about something else. Stop trying to distract from the discussion.
This discussion has to do with your claim of integers, which anyone with a decent grasp of sanity could clearly see is wrong
Or a basic understanding of math
If this discussion is wrong, then why are you continuing it? Are you trying to degrade your own sanity?
To prove that you’re wrong