I think the point was that if atlas is malfunctioning then I’m not poisoned
but the only world where atlas is malfunction is a world where Marluna is evil im p sure
yeah
but marluna was saying that if it was correct then atlas isn’t malfunctioning then marluna is good
which is not true
it can be malfunctioning and correct
i think i missed a negative in there somewhere
where were u when atlas is poisoned
i wa sin my room eating dorito when my friend call me
‘at las is malfunctoin’
‘no’
ah
that makes sense
No.
I’m saying if it’s incorrect, than Atlas couldn’t malfunction. (Because he made the real savant malfunction.)
Ergo I can’t be No dashi.
Or mostly.
Eliza can’t be No dashi.
I still can be, if my Minion is YBW.
oh ok i think i’m following
i don’t think that matters though because it being correct or not seems predicated on your claim
since the only other n1 target claimed was atlas on squirrel
I don’t think Atlas choosing squirrels role would be the same as picking a player, tho u can ask hosts
I don’t think philo would count as selecting me
since that’s selecting a character, not a player
Since like he chose the character, which in turn effected Squirrel as a player. He wasn’t asked to pick a player though, so techinically he never did pick Squirrel
more notably it doesnt matter because if squirrel is evil the info is fake and if he’s good it doesn’t change it at all
no one
i have not whispered with anyone yet
Oh no, someone is getting bopped on the head.
Wazza and YBW are always the same alignment this game from Hostess info. Solve YBW’s alignment and you get Wazza’s as well.
To me,YBW’s alignment comes down to if my meta read on both travellers being good holds up or not.
Is your metaread predicated on game balance?
Yes.
I may have mentioned it before, yet my meta read also depends on if the demon is Fang Gu or not. If it’s a Fang Gu, then you want both travellers as good for game balance.