jarek is openwolfing lmao
You’re claiming you were Pit Hagged?
Ah well who cares who believes me I’m having fun
That changes literally nothing, even if true.
well that solves that issue, we were already solving around it so lets continue
And yet you didn’t say this from D1?
I see I’m still treated as the villain as usual, because when I call it out suddenly everyone has a problem.
i assume the “now” means it’s either a new development or lolcatting
i would guess the latter but who knows
No I was just always the atheist and for some reason decided to do this whole thing trust me
In any case right or wrong if I continue to take this thread seriously it’d impact my enjoyment so I appreciate this development
Atheist claims Philosopher Clockmaker 4, claims Mutant, dies.
Yeah I know I’m pretty crazy
I’m pretty even you have standards.
EBWODP: Left out sure.
uh
also i am Not Good
and am thus Not Helping
uh
not alignment wise
im just sickly
Demon!Mist can only be the Vortox. This makes Jarek evil (because I don’t believe the Atheist claim).
Clockmaker 1 is false. This makes CRichard good. The Demon’s in the top half of the circle.
Atlas also died and counterclaimed Jarek before having a chance to whisper. If Atlas is good, Savant info is both false. That also means Eliza’s information (double 0s, second barista’d) is impossible due to Vortox.
By necessity, the scumteam would have to be Vortox!Mist, Cerenovus!Jarek, Pit Hag!Eliza.
Marluna’s information (Eliza and YBW paired) is reversed, which is possible. YBW’s information (1 > 2 > 0) should also be impossible depending on whether Vortox counts as players operating abnormally, since if Eliza’s evil that means nobody’s receiving anything on that third night.
My information inverted means the Demon did vote, which Mist did.
@YoubutWorse Math info?
i think its safe to say at this point one of jarek/squirrel is evil
if none of you knew that already somehow
me crich good, if someone was pithagged eliza was good
Can the Pit Hag change a dead player’s role?
doesn’t this world explicitly contradict squirrel’s savant info