So then in what world would closing the door on an Eliza axe also count as keeping that door open?
The one where an overzealous man believed he knew the absolute truth, 5 hours ago
Or perhaps in a world where you forming a cult and us deciding to execute Eliza are two independant events
Of course, this is blantly false.
Forming my cult should take priority in either of our executions, especially if Eliza is to be considered.
I’ve been posting the results of each cult before executions.
Irrelevant to the point being brought up
Unless they believed that you could be evil.
Directly impossible, with their current understanding
Let me rephrase
Logically impossible, from their current understanding
Unless they believed, at that time, that you could be an Evil Cult Leader
Yes.
Logically impossible, and otherwise, not enough to consider instantly disagreeing when eliza was being brought up as an execution
Let us think for a moment about zone being drunk:
Impossible. Arc’s d3 info would be randomly and pointlessly false, on both sides.
Moving on
Puzzledrunk is a debate, however, it would confirm I am not the demon.
Arc’s d1 would be false equally, aswell
The sts would have purposely chosen to make the drunk, you, incredibly obvious
Of course, you’d be confirmed to be the demon in that world
Could you explain that last bit and this bit together? Are they a part of the same model or nah
Arctic is drunk, recieved false info d1 and d3
Zone is puzzledrunk
1 Like
one thing i can think of is regarding your claim
you knew nuto was et, before the game, akin to what four other people did
yet you still claimed it, knowing it meant you needed to be puzzled or drunk
not knowing what plans i had
What do you think this implies?
You needn’t ask.
Further, ET is a barebones claim, and there was only claimroom for two drunks, of which one could be outted at any time, given the demon