Chair of Deception 2 - Game Thread - GAME OVER - UNSHACKLED AND TRICKSTER WIN

Forum Games Completed
,
#3541

I’m not asking you to claim here btw so that’s fine, was just wondering why you hadn’t

1 Like
#3542

Either way, we’re saying I attacked Garfooled, that’s why I’m being accused. Why would I as evil ever select her for the convert and the kill?

#3543

You would never

I have asked a question regarding Luminary’s convert and NE in my rolecard, awaiting an answer

#3544

Yes.

#3545

If an NE was selected for the first target, and a convertable target was selected for the second, would the NE still be added to the scumchat

And vice-versa

I had asked this question
Received a “yes”

1 Like
#3546

Yeah, I was around when these changes were made and I questioned them

Apparently it’s the same if Marquess is chosen as the first target, they’re attacked and the second target is still attempted to be converted

1 Like
#3547

I think Kiiruma is locktown imo, which is sort of an issue

#3548

Meaning atp in time I’m confident in Yami and Kii being Town mechanically

1 Like
#3549

Indeed. So then the accusation that I attack Garfooled makes no sense smh

And we don’t even know whether Likey was attempted to be converted or attacked

#3550

You would do one or the other, was the accusation

#3551

Both work, seemingly

#3552

Zorvo only accused me of attacking her but okay

#3553

Not really

Why would attacking Garfooled be better than attacking anyone else? How do you know Magnus wasn’t the killer and just roleblocked? And as stated, yet everyone is for some reason ignoring it, all NE’s are immune too. The evils could have hit the NE too

And you also don’t know whether the unshackled hit Garfooled before converting anyone else, and you also don’t know if she’s NE and got pulled into the chat. She’s claiming to be a Neutral Investigative role after all, and I don’t think those can be pulled in but maybe I’m wrong

So it rlly is quite a stretch. Maybe I attacked her, maybe I converted her, it doesn’t seem like either happened, and even if it did, there’s literally nothing to assume I did it

So I honestly feel like this accusation is rlly sus as I don’t see how someone could genuinely have this mindset. Call it OMGUS as it p much is, it just is very illogical

#3554

I was adapting the accusation, then

#3555

One moment
I will reply soon, I am busy.

#3556

Okay

#3557

@Garfooled check Magnus tonight, if he’s not heretic, he’s 100% town

#3558

VOTE: Unvote

Magnus was imprisoned N1 with no kill which makes me think they’re unshackled, HOWEVER, they cannot be Luminary as there’s a clear convert flipped so unless Magnus is Baron, they aren’t unshackled and the Inq is claiming there’s a Baron and not an Assassin. This makes me think if Magnus is Luminary, Garfooled has to be a ballsy af Assassin/Baron or something (more than likely Assassin)

#3559

bruh how tf do you unvote

#3560

I think you did it the right way