Chair of Deception 2 - Game Thread - GAME OVER - UNSHACKLED AND TRICKSTER WIN

Forum Games Completed
,
#1441

Or I might throw that scenario away

#1442

this is the second time you’ve ISO’d me this game and yet your thoughts on my D1 changed drastically despite there only being 4 hours until EOD from your last ISO on me, there’s no way your D1 thoughts on me have changed from those last few hours of EOD, especially with nothing as pointed out.

Also, you’ve played with me before

I really don’t like how people are grouping me and Pigeon together, even fucking Pigeon himself

#1443

I once again look back at this post and heavily dislike it as it feels like intentional wagon-starting/dramatization
As it is a wagon I do not necessarily disagree with and it’s a better alternative to me, VOTE: Frost

#1444

Interesting theory, but… if I were the Luminary or Cult Leader, I’d just convert instead, both are roleblock-immune on N1… and if I were the Assassin performing the kill… yeah, I guess that one’s possible, but I’d be silly to out being roleblocked almost immediately by questioning Zorvo.

#1445

Leafia claimed Shaman, which is not a protective.

1 Like
#1446

I equally dislike it! I just want to prove to Zorvo how ridiculous it is to group us together

#1447

Leafia’s claim:

The Shaman

Azure Dragoon Social

Totem of Dying (Day) - Target player cannot be healed tonight. Cannot target the same player two days in a row. - 2 uses

Siphon Life (Night) - Target a player. When they die, you will steal their first night ability as a 1 use ability that can be used alongside other actions. If their first night ability would be one of the following, you will get the corresponding ability that is listed - Infinite Uses

  • Capable of targeted killing: Heal
  • From Unshackled/Cult: Lacerate [see Assassin]
  • From Neutral Evil: Stakeout [see Spy]
  • Otherwise unusable: Heal

Defeat the Unshackled or Cult and any Neutral Evils.

The Shaman converts into The Warlock or The Pontiff.

#1448

Wow
This post was worthless

#1449

(This is a joke btw don’t kill me)

1 Like
#1450

no it wasn’t I did not wanna go and check what that did LMAO

1 Like
#1451

VOTE: Magnus

#1452

Three or so different players have mistaken Leafia’s claim for being a protective role, when it’s really a conditional backup.

1 Like
#1453

What if that claim is fake.

#1454

she said Shaman the first time and I was like “yeah that sounds like a role that’s in the game”

#1455

Care to explain?

#1456

Even if Leafia’s claim is fake, that doesn’t mean she protected me last night.

1 Like
#1457

mech

#1458

Thats my point, someone did save yours

I didn’t mentioned Leafia.

#1459

VOTE: Ranta

#1460

I had a random thought just… if we elect an evil Lord, would they lose access to their chat?
If so then honestly we can use lordship as a slight investigative ability lol.

See if wolves seem more or less coordinated.

If they don’t lose access then just ignore me but was an interesting musing since I was just thinking how… well, in the game, the king ofc doesn’t have access to scumchat so would they here? Hm