and in not rescinding it it added to the pressure giving scum an extra kill
still kinda insane, that nobody in marl/litten/vulgard/windward died
but wolves killled ruby/creatures
1 Like
VOTE: Sarasvati
I’m going to be bold and say this is actually just an atheist game
i’m fine killing vulgard
VOTE: Vulgard
impossible
night said during ch0 that ch1 specifically wouldn’t be an atheist game
2 Likes
what even is an atheist game?
it said atheist
it did not say that there was no evils
The post restriction thought occurred to me with Litten around the same time Zenon brought it up, but I didn’t think it was AI, I didn’t think it was impactful and I left it be.
i think my heads a little back to normal
i’m about to smoke tho so 
it’s gonna be short lived
this is
a good find
Atheist game says that there are no evils in a game. The host is the evil one. In order to win you must kill the host
how is that even fun
1 Like
I never said it was fun
2 Likes
artemis pointed it out, fyi
1 Like
Like
Look at the night kills
You got to be kidding me
Unless I’m misclearing all of wind/atlas/marl/Vulgard then it’s an atheist game and the hosts are choosing the kills, the kills they think would be the funniest
And it lines up with the fact that when I asked if I could vote the hosts I was told I could
It’s fun in BOTC because it’s an open setup and evils could fakeclaim Atheist so it isn’t open and shut. If this was an Atheist game, it would be Kiiruma’s flavour.
Even if it were an Atheist game (it’s not), you’d wait until ELO here to decide.
it’s not possible
How?