i think vaporeons would be considered pests for spreading waterborne diseases if they were real so keeping one at all would be frowned upon
i imagine for people who keep vaporeon youd have to drop those chlorine tablets for pools on them
in a world were keeping vaporeons is normal i think this gives the idea that youre planning to drink your vaporeon though. so probably
me when 6.5 hour combat session
waterborne and fecundityborne
@Mods Please add dislikes to FoL
Discourse is a popular forum software that is used by many online communities to discuss a wide range of topics. One of its key features is the ability for users to show appreciation for posts and comments by clicking the “Like” button. However, some people have suggested that adding a “Dislike” button would also be beneficial. In this essay, I will argue that adding a “Dislike” button to Discourse is a bad idea.
Firstly, the addition of a “Dislike” button would likely lead to an increase in negative comments and feedback. This is because some users may use the button to express their dislike or disagreement with a particular post or comment, without providing any constructive criticism or feedback. This could create a more hostile and negative environment within the community, which would not be conducive to productive discussion or collaboration.
Secondly, the “Dislike” button could be used for trolling or harassment. Some users may use the button to intentionally target and harass other users by disliking all of their posts or comments. This could create a hostile environment for the targeted user, and could discourage them from participating in the community.
Thirdly, the addition of a “Dislike” button could also lead to a decrease in participation and engagement within the community. This is because some users may feel discouraged from posting or commenting if they are constantly receiving dislikes or negative feedback. This could lead to a decrease in the overall quality of the community’s content, and could cause the community to stagnate or decline over time.
Finally, the addition of a “Dislike” button could also be confusing and unnecessary. The “Like” button already serves as a way for users to express their approval or appreciation for a particular post or comment. Adding a “Dislike” button would only serve to complicate matters and could create confusion for users who are not familiar with the feature.
In conclusion, adding a “Dislike” button to Discourse is a bad idea. It could lead to an increase in negative comments and feedback, be used for trolling or harassment, discourage participation and engagement, and be confusing and unnecessary. The “Like” button already serves its purpose of allowing users to express their appreciation for posts and comments, and there is no need to complicate matters with a “Dislike” button
happy Mandrake day
1 like on my post = 1 dislike on littens
Yo, adding dislikes to this forum software is like, totally a bad idea, man. Like, why do we even need a dislike button? It’s just gonna make things way more negative and harsh, ya know? Like, people will just use it to hate on others and bring down the vibe of the whole community.
And, like, what if some trolls start using it to bully other people? That would be so uncool, man. We don’t need that kind of negativity in our lives, dude. We just wanna chill and have a good time, ya know?
Plus, if we have dislikes, people might be too scared to even post anything, man. They’ll be all anxious about getting negative feedback and stuff, and that’s just gonna kill the buzz of the whole forum. We want people to feel free to express themselves and share their ideas, not feel like they’re gonna get hated on all the time.
So, like, seriously, let’s just stick to the likes, man. They’re way more positive and fun, and they keep the good vibes flowing. Let’s keep it chill and keep the peace, dude.
that was no less than 3 seconds
you were waiting for a response werent you
It is with great respect for the author’s viewpoint that I must disagree with the central premise of the essay that the addition of a “Dislike” button to Discourse is a bad idea. While the author makes some valid points regarding potential negative consequences of such an addition, there are several compelling reasons why a “Dislike” button would be beneficial to the platform.
Firstly, the author suggests that a “Dislike” button would increase negative comments and feedback. However, this argument assumes that users are only capable of expressing their opinions in a positive or negative manner. In reality, a “Dislike” button could provide an opportunity for users to provide constructive criticism and feedback. By indicating that they dislike a particular post or comment, users could be prompted to explain their reasons for doing so. This could lead to more nuanced and thoughtful discussions, rather than simply relying on superficial expressions of agreement or disagreement.
Secondly, the author argues that a “Dislike” button could be used for trolling or harassment. While it is certainly true that any new feature could potentially be abused, it is important to note that there are already mechanisms in place within Discourse to prevent such behavior. Moderators can remove posts or ban users who engage in trolling or harassment, and users can flag inappropriate content for review. The addition of a “Dislike” button would not necessarily increase the risk of such behavior, provided that these existing safeguards are maintained and enforced.
Thirdly, the author suggests that a “Dislike” button could discourage participation and engagement within the community. However, this argument overlooks the fact that the absence of a “Dislike” button could also have this effect. Users who feel strongly negative about a post or comment may simply refrain from engaging with it at all, rather than expressing their opinion through a “Like” button that doesn’t accurately reflect their feelings. By providing a “Dislike” button, users who disagree with a particular post or comment could still engage with it in a meaningful way, rather than simply avoiding it altogether.
Finally, the author suggests that a “Dislike” button would be confusing and unnecessary. However, it is worth noting that many other social media platforms already offer similar features. Facebook, for example, has a “Dislike” button in addition to its “Like” button, and this feature has not led to any significant confusion or negative consequences. Furthermore, the addition of a “Dislike” button could be implemented in a way that is intuitive and easy to use, just like the existing “Like” button.
In conclusion, while the author presents some valid concerns regarding the addition of a “Dislike” button to Discourse, there are several compelling reasons why such a feature would be beneficial to the platform. By providing users with a way to express their negative opinions in a constructive manner, the platform could facilitate more nuanced and thoughtful discussions. Furthermore, the potential for abuse or harassment can be mitigated through existing moderation mechanisms. Ultimately, the addition of a “Dislike” button would enhance the overall user experience on Discourse, rather than detract from it.
1 like on my post = 1 like on mays post
Thank you for taking the time to provide a rebuttal to my essay. I appreciate your well-articulated arguments, but I must respectfully disagree with your points.
Firstly, while it’s true that a “Dislike” button could provide an opportunity for users to provide constructive criticism and feedback, the reality is that people often use such features to express their dislike or disdain without offering any substantial feedback. This could lead to a toxic environment that discourages users from sharing their thoughts and ideas.
Secondly, while there are mechanisms in place to prevent trolling and harassment, the addition of a “Dislike” button could potentially make it easier for malicious users to engage in such behavior. It’s important to consider that not all users will be responsible and respectful, and a “Dislike” button could be exploited for the purposes of bullying or harassment.
Thirdly, while the absence of a “Dislike” button could discourage participation and engagement, it’s important to remember that the “Like” button is not the only way to engage with content. Users can still leave comments, share their opinions, and participate in discussions without the need for a “Dislike” button. Furthermore, the use of a “Dislike” button could lead to an overly negative environment that discourages users from engaging at all.
Lastly, while other social media platforms have implemented a “Dislike” button, it’s important to remember that each platform is unique and has different needs. Discourse is a platform that values constructive discussion and community engagement, and the addition of a “Dislike” button could potentially undermine these values.
In conclusion, while I respect your opinion, I believe that the potential negative consequences of a “Dislike” button outweigh any potential benefits. It’s important to promote positivity, respect, and constructive feedback within online communities, and a “Dislike” button may not be the best way to achieve this.
you just liked your own post may. you will be ridiculed in the streets for this
As a diligent scholar of the English language and its various nuances, I must wholeheartedly agree with the sentiment expressed in the aforementioned text snippet. The idea that “one like on my post = one like on May’s post” speaks to a sense of equality and fairness that should be cherished in our society.
Indeed, in this age of social media, it can be all too easy to fall into the trap of measuring our self-worth and popularity by the number of likes and followers we have. But the truth is that these metrics can be misleading and even harmful. By equating likes on one’s own post with likes on another’s, we are promoting a more equitable and community-minded approach to social media.
Furthermore, this idea speaks to a broader truth about the importance of supporting one another and lifting each other up. In a world that can often feel competitive and cutthroat, it is refreshing to see individuals who are willing to celebrate each other’s successes and promote mutual growth.
In conclusion, I must commend the author of the original text snippet for their thoughtful and egalitarian approach to social media engagement. May we all strive to follow their example and build a more supportive and inclusive online community.
I actually made the essay as an teenager high on drugs and then checked back on the forums and saw you responded
In response to your astute observation, I must concur that the act of liking one’s own post can indeed be seen as an act of vanity and self-promotion, which may invite ridicule and scorn from others. However, I would also like to argue that the act of liking one’s own post can also be interpreted in a more positive light.
Firstly, it is important to note that social media platforms often use likes as a measure of engagement and validation for content creators. In this context, liking one’s own post could be seen as a way of showing confidence in one’s own work, and a willingness to put oneself out there in a public space. By liking their own post, individuals are signaling that they believe in the value of their content, and are not afraid to stand behind it.
Furthermore, liking one’s own post can also be seen as a way of kickstarting engagement and conversation around a topic. By showing initial interest and enthusiasm for their own post, individuals may be more likely to engage with others who comment or respond to their content. In this way, liking one’s own post could be seen as a way of facilitating community building and conversation.
In conclusion, while it is true that liking one’s own post may invite ridicule and criticism from some, it is also important to recognize that this act can have more positive connotations. As with many things in life, context is key, and we should strive to view others’ actions with empathy and an open mind.
I told it to agree with you IDK why it’s defending me must be my charming nature
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I’m the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo.
The author of the aforementioned statement exhibits a level of confidence and skill that is both impressive and terrifying. The use of profanity, while not appropriate in all settings, adds to the intensity of the message being conveyed. It is clear that this individual has undergone rigorous training in the military, specifically in the Navy Seals, and has participated in dangerous and secret missions. Their expertise in gorilla warfare and prowess as a sniper in the US armed forces is nothing short of remarkable. However, it is important to note that the language used in this statement is aggressive and threatening. While it may be intended as a defense mechanism against those who would disrespect or insult the author, it can also create a hostile environment and escalate conflicts unnecessarily. Additionally, the use of violence as a means of resolving disputes is not always the best course of action. It is commendable that the author has a network of spies to assist them in tracking down those who would cross them. However, it is crucial to respect the privacy and autonomy of others. Tracing someone’s IP address without their consent is an invasion of privacy and can have serious legal repercussions. In conclusion, while the author’s skills and achievements are impressive, their language and approach to conflict resolution leave something to be desired. It is important to communicate effectively and respectfully, even in the face of adversity. Violence and threats should not be used as a means of asserting dominance or seeking revenge.
This content may violate our content policy. If you believe this to be in error, please submit your feedback — your input will aid our research in this area.
as opposed to high on life