yes
it is an arguement against capitalism
oh I mean I definitely agree that it would be good if artists (and everyone else) had their basic survival needs met no matter what
UBI moment
i mean we have AI art for their dnd game and I thought it was fine
i am against AI art in most cases but in the scenario of just needing a quick drawing of something with specific details and not having the time/effort/skill to do it your self I think AI art is fine (esp when its not trying to replace actual artists or being used for any commercial purpose)
Universal Based Income
unironically tho what are the actual arguements against UBI other than it costs a metric crap ton of money
okay maybe i shouldnât talk about this here
Eliza slowly leftpills the Forums: a series
(actually I just came up with one, a faulty one but still)
lockeâs fault
o fuck
inflation!
(or we could just not charge for baisc needs but shhhh)
idk man that robs the corporations of their money
(didnât this like actually happen for some of them back in the like 30s)
(that was when the farmer guys decided that maybe we shouldnât let corporations have control over basic necessities and established government control over things like water)
idk i havent gotten that far in apush
apush?
oh nvm i got it
i love that you liked it before realizing what it was lmao
(uh for the record the arguement I came up with is âpeople will get LAZY and spend it on BOOZE and OTHER POINTLESS THINGSâ)
(which sounds plausible but the funny part is)
(when you interview people and ask them what theyâd do with UBI theyâre like âOH IâD DO ALL THESE THINGS LIKE PAYING FOR MY FOODâ and then when you ask them what they think other people would do with UBI they say the above)
idk if thatâs actually true, idr where i got it but i think it was from a book that was about how the left is censoring the right, or something
(obviously i do not trust that book but i donât actually remember if thatâs where i got it from)