my opinion is that ai art should not be copyrightable
Not necessarily, even if I were to perfectly synthesize the chemical compounds that make a steak, it seems more fitting to call it “Artificial” than “Natural”
Your mother’s so widely available natural language processing model that she’s creating fake websites & social media profiles to bait clicks and manufacture outrage
Your mother’s so false that there IS May Read Guidelines bottom text.
correct
anything minus the actual thing is artificial
i mean “is an ai sampling your art violating X copyright law that it was protected under”
that’s also a dubious question though
else you will eventually find corporations firing actual artists simply because having an ai generating them will be cheaper
suits dont care about quality, only the cash income
so dont give them the choice, dont let anyone copyright art made by an AI
Your mother’s so going to play mahjong
i’d argue that if you own the rights to your creation, someone remaking it with an ai for commercial purposes would be violating that copyright
Yo mama’s so Pon that I riichii for her tsumo
Even if it were indistinguishable from an actual steak, such that there would be no test one could produce to accurately distingish them, I would still call it artificial because of the manufacturing proccess uaed to make it.
Your mother’s so Seven Pairs that she is a siren song luring sailors to mahjong shipwreck
yeah if your Al is gonna be a monetizable product then the samples cant include copyright protected work
modern ai are unfortunately not indistinguishable from actual intelligence though
Your father is so natural, he replaced in for your mother for this joke.
Your mother’s so May that she immediately declares Riichi whenever she has the chance
ai are like spiders
or ants
i fully agree with this yeah
Your mother’s so spiders that she is like ants
set to accomplish a specific task
you can make then feel things to an extent but
they’ll not be like us
but they could be simpler and feel, to a minor extent