no
reminds me of a copypasta
So today, for the first time, my little toddler finally counted to ten. Everyone was celebrating, saying how proud they are in my kid, and then Ben Shapiro kicks open the door. “Oh you think it’s impressive that they can count to ten? I can count to one million.” and then proceeded, in my living room for the next two weeks, to count to one million. He then said “yep, another lib destroyed” and then curbstomped my kid.
that open mouth is what you are right now
that coprse is what i want you to be right now
Lemao what a pussy absolutely
One bad day at work and you just push a kid off a swing?
My lower back was an inferno 24/7 for over a year but i still endured life like a normal person
OH THIS IS A GOOD ONE
Question 2: Is it possible for an action to be morally wrong solely because people find the idea of it a bit disgusting? For example, if lots of people found the idea of eating porridge disgusting, could it be morally wrong to eat porridge just for this reason and no other reason?
Yes
No
hot take: no
i am sorry but only cats can be involved in schroedinger’s question
is this leading to where i think it is
also NO
No.
Not really.
PROBABLY LEADING TO CANNIBAL STUFF
i was thinking it would be about homophobia
that being said, if you believe morality is subjective, yes is probably closer to the truth if only because of arbitrariness. but no objective standards of morality can punish ideas that are a bit disgusting
it’s difficult for something to be morally reprehensible for something that affects you and only you
The answer is no and I fucking hate when people imply otherwise and I will kill them all badly
my sister hates the smell of bananas and i consider it morally correct to regularly eat bananas in her presence
Popular opinion is usually nonsensical to me
There is no reason jaywalking should be illegal if you’re fast and assertive enough
oh fuck that
Question 3: Can an action be morally wrong if the only person (or people) harmed by it is the person (or people) undertaking the action? For example, could it be morally wrong to smoke if it is true that nobody except the smoker is harmed? (There are two things you should bear in mind here. First, if you respond “No” it will also be assumed that you do not think an action can be morally wrong if nobody at all is harmed by it. Second, for the purposes of this activity, you should assume that every action that aims at doing harm, or which carries the reasonable expectation of causing harm, actually causes harm; in other words, don’t answer ‘Yes’ just because you think the assassin who fails in an attempt to kill her target - and thereby causes no actual harm - has nevertheless behaved immorally).
Yes
No
it depends if you eat porridge infront of other people or not, the amount of the population that thinks its disgusting, the reasoning behind eating the porridge (which is just to because people thing its disgusting)
doing things that displeases others solely to displease others with no gain is morally bad, i think