i’m a “you can do whatever you want with yourself but don’t let me know about it or make me watch” truther
1 Like
No and no
A) Yes, the cat
B) No, it’s her business
1 Like
like the answer is no
no one was harmed
but what the fuck
I’M HARMED FROM HEARONG ABOUT THIS
1 Like
no and maybe
I’m not a pet person so I shouldn’t try to answer that
1 Like
See I feel the same way but it seems people disagree. And ask for criticism evem though they don’t want it
1 Like
the preog questions were a good idea im disgusted
the cat was clearly harmed
no
the second question is different than the premise. someone casually eating a cat would bother me, not disgust me though. i wouldnt judge them if they ate it if it died in an accident and had no other food
1 Like
THIS IS TRUE
the cat was harmed already it doesn’t count
roadkill is apparently the most moral way to consume meat, according to… peta.
eating dead things to honour their memory is common in a lot of cultures, i think
or it used to be
3 Likes
Philosophy Question: You’re reading the works of a notable philosopher, and you realize they are advocating for quite heavy-handed precepts that they don’t themselves follow. Should you take anything they say seriously?
1 Like
actually
that might be fair yeah
intentionally killing them to eat them is a different matter i think
depends upon culture but using everything you kill/saw dead is absolutely a way to honor the dead
if its just cause she wanted an evening snack its kinda gross
if it was for another reason its fine
1 Like
atlas if you died could I eat you
1 Like
If you loved your cat then you should bury them properly as you would any loved one. So the act is either evidence that you didn’t really love them, or an insult to their memory.