I also suddenly games FoL consciousness so not that unusual
again not really. kinda weird but meh itâs really not my place to judge i would just feel more comfortable if i never knew about it
Not in the land of the free
my recent dream was when I took a nap
there was the fibonacci sequence in it
except there was insane things where I⌠called a phone company or something associated with that and they said they could send me the first 32 or 40 numbers in it for my own use (in this dream it was somehow used for this)
also i could not compute it correctly because dream moment
there was a reason i asked them to spoil it
1 Like
magnus was another level
magnus achieved singularity
It was a joke about how I wasnât here until 2022
1 Like
can you do the drowning child one next Litten
2 Likes
ANALYSIS TIME
Moralising Quotient: 0%
Yuk-O-Meter: 0%
Analysis
Moralising Quotient
The Moralising Quotient is an average measure of your tendency to condemn the actions described in these scenarios as morally wrong. A score of 100% indicates a fully moralising position. A score of 0% is a fully permissive response.
Yuk-O-Meter
The Yuk-O-Meter measures the tendency of your moral judgements to reflect the feelings of distaste or disgust you might experience when confronted with certain kinds of behaviour. A score of 100% means that each time youâve stated you would be bothered or disgusted by a particular behaviour, you have also judged that behaviour to be morally wrong. A score of 0% means that you have never judged a behaviour youâve stated you find bothersome or disgusting to be morally wrong. If the Yuk-O-Meter reads ânullâ, it means you have not indicated that you would be bothered or disgusted by any of the behaviours described in the scenarios featured here.
yep!
Scenario 1 Analysis
Carl Bianchiâs mother was very ill. On her deathbed she asked him to promise that he would visit her grave at least once a week. Carl didnât want to disappoint his mother, so he promised that he would. But after his mother died, he didnât keep his promise. He was too busy. He didnât tell anyone about his promise, and he has never felt guilty for failing to do as he said he would.
You responded that Carl Bianchi did no moral wrong in failing to keep the promise he made to his mother on her deathbed. This certainly fits with your view that there was no harm associated with his dishonesty. However, there is an interesting tension in your responses. Even though you think there was no moral wrong and that no harm occurred, you nevertheless claimed it would have bothered you to have watched Carl lying to his mother. This is a little odd. There is no logical inconsistency here, but it is somewhat implausible from a psychological point of view. Put simply, it just isnât clear why youâd find it bothersome to watch Carl lying to his mother, which, after all, is just a matter of watching one person talking to another, if there were not something about the morality of what was unfolding that you found troubling (perhaps, for example, to do with thoughts about betrayal or deception).
Nevertheless, despite this oddity, overall your responses to this particular scenario fit together pretty well.
54% of the 129124 people who have completed this activity agree with you that Carl Bianchi did no moral wrong in not keeping the promise he made to his mother.
interesting you have nothing to contribute to the -cest discussion
I read this as Yugioh Meter
I agree with this as I resent hookup culture
Thereâs no love in alabama, just more hookups
1 Like
i read this as âcan you do the drowning child one next to littenâ
we have already established that magnus is an artificial intelligence he just needed some time to become sapient
this philio knows nothing and is an armchair
1 Like
oh youâre from there?
I tried really hard on this stream not to call the Clash Blaster the âCash Bastardâ