watched a video once of a game where the st procced pacifist on themselves twice to make everyone think they were lleech and justified it with “it favors good because it removes a demon candidate in f3”
1 Like
i forgor
tbf good did win
1 Like
on themselves
they also used the gossip to kill the gambler who was gambling the pacifist as pacifist (tbf the gossip was really powerful)
1 Like
knowing your music taste the only way i can think of describing this album in things you have heard is between Radiohead and death grips
As a mischievous human being, I disagree. But the remnants of my morals agree, so I guess I’ll have to accept I can’t legally fool the players.
(…which means I have to fool the reviewers instead! 
)
Okay, so… the only concerns I have at the moment are:
- “What is defined as an unusual wincon?” and
- “What level of intentionally misleading the players is allowed / non-egregious?”
Other than these two, everything else looks reasonable to me. (…for now, af least. I can’t guarantee future!Zone won’t complain about some niche sentences.)
I’ll think on it
I’m not sure how to word it without saying some dumb shit like ‘spirit of the game’
3 Likes
You should generally not deceive your players in sign-up.
2 Likes
I mean yes I will
1 Like
they saved themselves?
I like doing things
Why do you want to do these things? What is it in service of? Who does it make the game better for and why?
1 Like
as in will you keep that limit
pacifist can save themselves yeah
the way you said themselves implied the st proc’d the pacifist on themselves as atheist
1 Like
saving pafacist twice is fine imo
Boys don’t know this
Boys don’t know what
everyone thought the pacifist was the lleech the second time. this was done with the explicit intent to frame the pacifist as the lleech