Cookie Thread Act 7: Romulus

General
#26150

For three it is 2:1
For four it is either 2:2 or 3:1
For five it is 3:2

…and “it has to be maximum”? Yes! That’s it!
Now that I know the selections cannot be pure…
YES! With the maximum, even if it is purely muddy waters, the user won’t learn anything new! (Well, no. That’s arguably VERY wrong, because if you know the number of wet mud, then it would be very much able to clean–) Okay, okay! Then, how about forcibly setting the number such that it always fails if the chosen number is equal to or under the wet mud?

Alright. Let’s do this again from the top.

Divide everyone into groups.
Number of groups has to be more than the number of wet mud. (Else all fails.)
Results may vary depending on the number of contaminated groups.

…YES! This is it!

1 Like
#26151

Not feedback; results.

Because why stop at “keeping information for oneself” when you can go beyond and “real-ize the power by showing the effect”? A form of feedback that is impossible to be seen directly by anyone; because the only “proof” everyone involved has are the “words” of the user and “the existence of [REDACTED]”!

1 Like
#26152

Well that was fun.
The only unfortunate thing is that all of this time and energy (i.e., brainpower) was spent for one role… when in reality I wanted an entire setup.

1 Like
#26153

host twostep when

1 Like
#26154

Whenever I make setups, I always try to cheat when “good setups” are involved.

You think you are special? Nah, you aren’t.
You think there are only monsters? Nah, there aren’t. (There are more creatures that are “disguised” as monsters.)
You think something? Nah, nothing.

The ultimate hidden agenda that I have been keeping for a while is: “Abandon mech. Return to mountain(ous).” The mech is fancy, cool, and innovative! …but they are just there to distract you from the true core mechanics of the game; social deduction.

I myself am not good with that one important mechanic, so instead I delude myself by adding mechanics into this mechanic-less world! Mwahaha! :smiling_imp:

1 Like
#26155

IDK what this means, but I do have an idea “requiring multiple co-hosts”. :smiling_imp:

1 Like
#26156

could a few spectators do

2 Likes
#26157

No. Because this idea plan requires people who are willing to spend their time, (by extension) motivation, and “some degree of brainpower” into the game.

The majority of specs in my chat do nothing. All they want is to know what I did to the setup, and then leave. Or they just do some smalltalk. Less than a handful are genuine spectators, and I don’t believe they have the things I need to execute this “funni” idea.

1 Like
#26158

i would recommend not trying to deceive your co-hosts, of course, if your spectators don’t meet your standards
otherwise, good luck.

2 Likes
#26159

Unfortunately, the idea I am thinking of involves exactly that, so it is literally impossible for me to follow your recommendation.

1 Like
#26160

At least, for this idea.
Every other game? That’s a fair recommendation.

1 Like
#26161

oh hey we’re on the same wavelength about something!!!

2 Likes
#26162

banger setup called two step

1 Like
#26163

Step 1. Do
Step 2. Profit

2 Likes
#26164

Never heard of it.
What’s the details?

#26165

Ligjt Nigel so good no sleep…the book isn’t tricking me. I know the answer to the damned puzzle but I don’t KNOW HOW IT HAPPENS, it tricked me last time wich such a riddle…lack of sleep cat ramble intensfies

#26166

IVE FIVUTED IT OUT

#26167

MAYBE

#26168

litten its 7:32 am

1 Like
#26169

I can fall asleep at any timeeee

1 Like