@Willow was killed by the mafia! They became a spooky ghost!
They were...
The Player, Vanilla Town
Abilities: You have none, only your voice and ability to vote.
Win Condition: You win when all threats to the Town have been eliminated.
The Player, Vanilla Town
Abilities: You have none, only your voice and ability to vote.
Win Condition: You win when all threats to the Town have been eliminated.
This topic was automatically opened after 23 hours.
VOTE: Wigfrid
VOTE: Wigfrid
I mean I’d 100% vote and it is where my vote’s going to be today but uh, do you all want to talk first or are we just hoping game ends here and if not then we’re sorting things out in F3?
I would like to choose the latter.
The Player, Vanilla Town
Abilities: You have none, only your voice and ability to vote.
Win Condition: You win when all threats to the Town have been eliminated.
The Player, Vanilla Town
Abilities: You have none, only your voice and ability to vote.
Win Condition: You win when all threats to the Town have been eliminated.
This topic was automatically opened after 9 minutes.
Firstly, that instant hammer was messed up. Even if Wigfrid flipped red and the game ended, it would still be messed up because you all gave them zero opportunity to defend themselves whatsoever. I discouraged an early hammer on Warly for much that same reason, it just doesn’t feel fun to be on the receiving end of, no matter your alignment. Please do not encourage early hammers again in the present nor future.
When prompted to form a judgment call on anybody in the game by Wormwood, Woodie instinctively pulled Wortox’s name out of thin air with a fairly loose reason to suspect them. Rather than being a sign of undue focus as I would have previously considered, Woodie literally just returned to the start of the thread and named the first person they saw (despite having formerly read the thread). Wortox never pointed towards this incident as evidence against their partnership, and I find it less intuitive to consider a scenario in which Woodie would intend to specify a partner for no reason against just naming the literal first player to cross their page.
Here is the caveat to that line of reasoning:
Wortox, on the other hand, hasn’t been pulling his weight, so I’m starting to side-eye him a bit.
[…]
Gonna have to cast my vote for Wortox for now.
VOTE: Wortox
This outright contradicts Woodie’s above statement, revealing an inconsistent outlook on Wortox’s slot at a time period when the latter was the leading wagon. This logic was principally used as an excuse to vote Wortox, and it wasn’t a substantiated bus either, but the way it’s conveyed here feels tacked on. A way in which to vote Wortox without any degree of ceremony, in a sense more often aligned with sheeping than bussing since there’s no credit to gain from this vote.