Big in spirit. That’s why I said magnanimous. I was searching for a word that meant big in spirit
Perhaps more “bigheaded in spirit” than its usual more generous use as a Word
Your odd musings that one could mediate from a level neutral position have merit, I suppose. Determining which players supersede their stations versus those who clamour for attention from below, and elevating the rare diamonds in the rough. My occasional scriptures about the weaker parties encumbering the so-called “leaders” of this game, who only perceive their allies as sheep or shields to be thrown at others akin to Daeron or Chaos… I can see the resemblance. I’m flattered, though.
1 Like
Also I was bullshitting and the alias doesn’t sound like you’d choose it. But it sounds like other people would think you’d choose it. It sounds like tutuu impersonating you
1 Like
You’re intelligent enough to not want to stand out here!
I’m not. katze
It sounds like an Achro pick, though!
Potentially a Litten selection if you’re familiar with past miscs where he tried to be an emperor twice.
1 Like
While Atlas wouldn’t ever choose Katze, it’s surprising there weren’t multiple iterations.
Wow that was super bigoted what you guys just said you should delete those posts in case this chat goes public
1 Like
But i have info
1 Like
First i did what we suggested and gave u guys +2 and attacked chaos.
Second i lookouted Duck and only legends visited so i think it could be a noise? If it was a player theyre more likely to have allies visit them? Idk.
On n3 or n2 I was bribed to attack Gabriel (we now know that this was memeking ability).
This makes me think Gabriel is a player and memeking had info unless they were rlly dumb and bribed me to randomly attack a noise, but seeing as there were multiple outted player aliases that feels unlikely.
1 Like
My other info is D1 i asked bystander if they had a final 2 and they said they did sorry and i said no worries lets not chat but hmu if your F2 dies and they never did
And D1 Jane messaged me and I asked for protection and they said they already were in a ring.
So this info combined + what i know of game + them as people = i think likely jane/bystander are allies, potentially very tight allies.
1 Like
Oh shit yeah. I gave u both +2 do now i need to give someone else
Who did they even attack how come only our targets died lmao what is everyone else doing. I did prevent chomps and gabriel from visiting me and took no damage so maybe they attacked me.
Tonight I can prevent 3 ppl from visiting each other but cant include myself, sunflower, gabriel. So this ability is actually very good now therr are 8 ppl left cuz its been useless so far. We can either disrupt a protection OR if we know either of you are getting teamed, i can prevent 2 people from visiting either of you (you also wouldnt be able to visit them)
1 Like
Medal is for sure an npc its such a lame name imo
I think its super important for us not to message people with similair plans or similair game outlook or similair questions as then it is super obvious we are allied and i dont think anyone knows im allied with u guys
I’d imagine it would be unlikely to Chaos to attack Duck, which would’ve resolved the question splendidly, yeah.
Chomps apparently didn’t want Duck to be harmed in particular, but that’s really all the information we have. It could be a noise alias, but it’s rather neutral.
Gotcha. This makes sense to me.
Even if Jane and Bystander are tightly paired, I doubt either would be strongly strategising. Marluna’s presumably coordinating with at least the latter, and I’d sorta feel as though Marluna’s the best next player to a tactician.
Chomps and Childe should be non factors…
If we can assume the above triad to be correct, Bystander had a spent protection on Marluna last night and should thusly be shielding Jane tonight. Therefore, Bystander/Marluna should be our targets.
Or we could disrupt their protection. Marluna’s a healer, after all.