You have a terrible habit of answering questions with more questions.
Hmm, long story short - I focus on one person at a time, iso and reread to get macro view on theirs playstyle.
I’m macro player. As scum I also make long-time plans. Also I do a bit of psychological analysis and trying to understand other person.
I hate and will never do what most people are doing, aka. making micro reads from the thread post-by-post basis. It’s just way better to try to go through whole approach of a person and theirs game as a whole than swap between 50 different people.
Tl;dr. strategist player archetype.
Which comes with own flaws - aka. I’ve had time to analyze 3 people day 1. And one of them is dead.
That’s same reason why people like Wazza are mad at me in game, cause I am able to do “nothing” for like two days, when in reality I’m setting up for the game.
Same thing why I hate readlists, cause I don’t think anyone is able to actually read ~20 players at game accurately. With rereads, with isos.
And this readlists are bound to be inaccurate and change. Mine on the other hand happened to be 100% accurate on like day 2-3 with 15+ players alive. Down to a role, not even only alignment. Well, for this game it’s not going to happen, cause I definitely won’t be able to read 50 players in 24h days, iso, make notes, etc.
But now again, do you think my approach of discussing events and what are theirs conclusions for game is a bad approach to have something going on for that playstyle. While at the same time, as I said, I read some people… who I’m expecting to live till the endgame?