FAM4: Thread 5 - Day 3

[Jinrou]

i said this earlier when someone claimed they might have gotten rbed

I personally didnt rb anyone

[Gorta]

most of my ability is the ability to take a few shots

[Baudib1]

@Gorta

most of my ability is the ability to take a few shots

Who did you shoot? This should be verifiable.

[Atlas]

so you’re a conditional (with a hard condition to meet) rber (whos rbs suck to use)

[Jinrou]

yes

the prediction part was true, I actually gotta predict things and when I do it correctly I get rbs

those can’t block everything tho. I got one rb yesterday and I forgot to submit a prediction tonight

[May]

@FAMHost

Role Review
Night Action — Multitaskable
Choose “player” or “action”, inspect target unallied player, and learn the tags the player has if you chose “player” or the tags their actions have if you chose “action”. If you learn player or action has 2 or more tags this way, gain 1 Complexity Charge . If a player inspected this way has an inspection action, gain 2 Complexity Charges instead.

Here’s the tag investigative. I should have shown as both having a tag myself and taking action(s) with a tag, so whichever way I was investigated, it should’ve given a positive.

@FAMHost

Suggest Changes
Night Action
Give target unallied player 1 of the following tags permanently:

• Enigmatic
• Loud
• Hungry

I didn’t get any of these tags; Porscha was not the one who tagged me.

@FAMHost

The result of investigation effects is determined at the end of the Night, not when it resolves. For example, two trackers cross-targeting will successfully observe each other. Another example: if an effect changes a player’s Guild, a player using an action that inspects a target player’s Guild would always learn the new Guild.

Order of operations actually shouldn’t be relevant here, as investigatives resolve at the end of the night.

[Gorta]

no, I can take a few ITAs

[Gorta]

all the shots are currently used up

[Zone_Q11]

Reads list (townreads) “if anyone who shot Mafia (and did damage) were to be townread”:

• slanktai
• Apocryphal
• Ari
• Ash
• Atlas
• Baudib
• beancat
• BradLand
• bystander
• carbonated
• Carrot
• dyachei
• Eliza
• gori
• Gorta
• Hallia
• Hazard
• Hippo
• Kanave
• Lucid
• May
• Meuh
• Selkie
• Derps
• Someone
• Yawn
• Zone

POE:

• Achro
• Artemis
• ash4fun
• Ashlyn
• Brakuren
• ChaosNinjaGaming
• crazynuto
• Creature
• Dum
• Ephemera
• Frostwolf
• Jane
• Jinrou
• Kork
• Marluna
• Memekingpizza
• Millium
• neil
• nutella
• pandora
• Ranta
• Wazza
• Windward
• Zugzwang

[May]

@Baudib1

Did you dispute her at all?

She allegedly claimed this in chat with Brakuren, not publicly

[Gorta]

I have another ability which is verifiable if certain people want to verify it

[Baudib1]

@May

@Baudib1

Did you dispute her at all?

She allegedly claimed this in chat with Brakuren, not publicly

Ok

[Jinrou]

abilities are nice and all but do they make u town

[Zone_Q11]

@Gorta

I have another ability which is verifiable if certain people want to verify it

I already verified that you intruded the masonry.
(Along with katze, but katze already flipped.)

[ElizaThePsycho]

no

[Jinrou]

can a wolf intrude a masonry?

[Wazza]

Fallen into POE, my career is over

[Atlas]

@kanave i think her vig counts as public

[May]

Because I gained the tag on N1, I can actually easily see a moderror here? If Brakuren were a wolf lying about his chat with Porscha, he would’ve seen Porscha’s investigative result. In Wolf Chat. Porscha has no reason to lie about the tags to a villager. The inconsistency shouldn’t really be relevant?

[Atlas]

thats two thats correct

the other is incorrect.