My lawyer (bystander) advised me not to answer this question under oath.
But while we are talking as friends, yes I am.
My lawyer (bystander) advised me not to answer this question under oath.
But while we are talking as friends, yes I am.
Ok we can shoot this
Why not just go ahead and claim?
I hate the donât shoot me Iâll be gone wait till I claim thing
Claim now or die coward
Like ???
Mindmeld be like
We are in a gamestate where 80% of wolves are dead and almost all the villagers are alive.
It actually is fine to give hazard a day and resolve the slot tomorrow instead.
We are 5 years away from endgame and even if he is the wolfvig I donât actually care.
You lied to me youâre clearly a wolf with them
you are not wrong.
some roles might want to get one more use before they out. And it makes no difference to us in this gamestate.
Donât think he will kill 20 villagers overnight.
But also my theory on mafia is I donât give a fuck about your claim other than like IC or mason, letting people live for half assed resolving things is silly
I disagree with this because I like resolving actions
very much so. Unless you are under pressure to hit a wolf which we are not really right now.
Anything thatâs not an IC isnât actually resolving was kinda the Crux of my point
that is not how pot of greed works.
yes!
not really
at the very minimum, if you learn a specific wolf role is in the game (ex: mafia KP), you can mechanically poe the people who can be that role
ex:
Counterpoint if you kill them all youâll find the wolf anyways
i hate breakfast ngl