Ah wait… the “just read it” probably refers to that post rather than the Iso. Nonetheless, I would still like Pigeon to explain his reads on Magnus and I.
ye no this is just my first game in many months lol
it’s a textbook copout that i dont really buy, so a disagree here
magnus’ second post didn’t really improve in any capacity
it doesn’t feel right nb4 im just out here insulting magnus lmao
cloned feels like he’s trying really hard to make sure people know he’s doing something without outright pointing people towards it
idrk if that makes sense but i dont like it
gorta has done nothing interesting with his two pop-ins
interestingly enough, the venn diagram of people who are comfortable enough with saying i sound dead inside as wolf and the people who would sign up for a 50-post limit graph have like
zero overlap so i am very confused on professor
This is why I am undecided on cheese’s “RT” because despite the intention not really aligning with his actions, I don’t understand why cheese would feel a need to do this as a wolf when he was townread as much as he was wolfread for his posting. An entire reversal, as you put it, may not be warranted to make as a wolf.
I vaguely understand. His method of solving seems more theatrical than genuine, though such is often the case with “reaction tests”.
I’m really reaching here, but I suppose his request for everyone to post reasons for why they were voting Leafia shows some regard for the state of the game? Though I do wonder why he didn’t simply backread to check for peoples’ reasons as at this point there were only around 100 posts.
Perhaps you ought to spend your time figuring out my alignment rather than my identity.
This self-awareness is reaching TWTBAW levels of wolfiness, but unfortunately TWTBAW does not exist. At least not for most players.
Well, I appreciate the gesture but this is more of a statement than a read. Can you elaborate any further?
That wasn’t what I was referring to - I was concerned about Leaf essentially repeating what Frog said without any original thought. It felt opportunistic to me.
Not sure how that makes me feel about you, though.
The exact posts:
I misread the post as “idk why my brain is just screaming while I’m reading these”
which would indicate a headache
could be that cloned did too
but whatever you two are probably gonna tunnel each other regardless of what I say
could be
in the very least I don’t think it’s W/W because it’s too convoluted
why hello there
what do you need?
pry sure that’s fair game but that sort of mental gymnastics usually confuses me more than it helps
but go ahead do your thing
fair enough
hmm
after rereading the cheese post his reasoning looks flimsier than before
but I’m not sure I follow what you’re saying here:
do you mean that the post looks performative?
um
I’m sorry what
anyways, I finally finished getting caught up with 46 posts to give
@clonedcheese if you’re town then the best way to read me is to READ MY POSTS and not rely on awful ass reaction tests that accomplish next to nothing.
@Squirrel2412 just top of head most confident reads you can give right now.
Maybe it seemed that way, but I assure you I was implying something differently entirely: I had read the thread, had limited time to make a move, so I voted Leafia as a sort of placeholder.
I figured I’d rather cast a vote than nothing. I had read the entire thread, and was in the process of rereading and analysing posts and player connections. I analysed somewhat in my second post.
The same reason anyone else voted Leafia. Wasting votes, acting inherently scummy. Therefore, nothing helpful.
Correctamundo.
This entire analysis of Professor’s doesn’t really say a whole lot. “Kinda Town, kinda Wolf… meh, townlean.”
well
theres two people that im kinda closing in on and if youre the first, then i think youre town, and if you’re the second, i think youre scum, so it’s pretty important to me. as it is, though, ive made the observations that I can and can only read you off of abstract principles at the moment, so i’d say figuring out who you are is pretty important for me.
um, I think I want to go back here, so I’m sorry if this has been covered too many times in advance, but, I don’t think I’m ready to move on from this.
So… your thing was:
''I’m setting a trap by making a bad read"
But again, I don’t think it was like even a bad read?
I read you say you have no meta with pigeon to know whether or not your read applies to them, but like… … … how do you know it’s a bad read???
Am I focusing on something dumb here???
I was trying to make a new readslist and I don’t have you sorted well fwiw, that’s why I’m back here <----
I have expressed a decent level of uncertainty on cloned’s alignment… I’m surprised this is the impression that you have.
This is interesting. The only comment on my alignment you have made is a townread of one of my thoughts. What led you to this conclusion?
This is… pretty much it, yes. There was a mixture of things leaning me either way, but I decided you were ultimately probably town.
Yes. I know you are wolfy as both alignments by standard metrics, however, I’ve legitimately seen you TWTBAW as a wolf before… therefore I know it doesn’t apply to you especially.
Why can’t you read me via normal principles? Do either of the players you have in mind have some sort of abstract metas?
i can easily see why a wolf would do this- either to be seen like they’re doing something and not simply taking up space in thread (like i mentioned earlier), or to appear carefree about what they do.
in regards to your reaction test cloned, what i disagree with most is this particular bit of reasoning.
i don’t think this is a good callout. it reads “well uh i did a bad thing but look over here they also did a bad thing- don’t focus on me!” i believe it was an attempt to deflect attention in wolfy frustration (which yes, is obviously different from town frustration). though i will say i like this RT of yours, i don’t see why scum would put this much unnecessary effort into something that wasn’t needed as a saving grace.
of my entire post; you only quote me to make a cutesy remark, as if you’re trying to fluff your posts out. of everyone quoted only mine seems to serve no real purpose. why? don’t quote me and clutter my pings if all you’re going to do is sass.
noted.
well, have you completed this process? also, i would prefer it if you acknowledged the rest of my post and answered the questions i posed.
i’m catching up to the rest of the thread currently, and i’m going to focus on Brad, pigeon, and Leafia in particular as i finish doing so, (and would appreciate if others talked with me as well about these).
the top of the head thoughts i’d like to expand on there:
understanding the Leafia case and getting a better knowledge of her meta, and on what specifically it applies here (with a focus on the early pileup and vote analysis).
on the subject of Leafia’s wagon analysis, the matter of pigeon. i most disliked the last two votes, and would care to talk with @thepigeonnyc himself for some real-time here.
and lastly, Brad. i remember he was liked earlier though- i don’t particularly understand why. cheese’s case requires a further look from me.