Brad - Hi
Aelin - Also started off with instant stance taking but with more of an offensive mindset, instantly came up with a theory of what Frog and Professor were doing while stating she calling them a possible W/W.
Her response to my question about her townreads got everything I needed to know so townread.
Illwei - At first went on to out reads one of them being a scumread on Leafia and pursue’d it which typically leans into town!Illwei. However she got back and hasn’t done anything since she doesn’t want to read wall posts. Sticking with initial guns and calling her town.
I explained Illwei slightly before this post so look at my iso to see why I’m reading her as town.
Frog - Started off with instant stance taking in his first post and pretty much agreed with him on Leafia at that moment with pretty much the same reasoning but with different wording. Was trying to figure if she was town through questioning and trying to find what she is thinking.
Very high energy posting which shows that he’s vibing mixed with getting reads as he going through the game. This I believe is my first real game with Frog that wasn’t a mash or didn’t have him hiding underground in a team game (Sorry about the Day 1 btw) so I’m willing to call that towny.
Professor - Defends Leafia since she always got D1’d in games which is fair if you want to stop something from happening constantly, which I’m fine with and don’t see anything ill will wise regarding the game.
What’s villagery from him is his questioning others, me specifically, of why they’re voting Leafia. He’s not looking to totally take someone’s head off but he’s trying to solve them based on how they answered and him saying I looked decent in my answering shows that.
He has nuanced reasoning to read people a certain way either town or scum.
Squirrel - His post talking about Leafia trying to shift the blame to Professor while taking Frog’s ideas in an opportunistic way was a decent look because it was analysis that I didn’t see before. Agree with his point of Frog’s “ABORT ABORT” post being something that you’d feel like you would call performative but you won’t for reasons you can’t explain.
Does bring up Leafia’s D1 streak to Aelin but holds judgment on Aelin’s alignment rather than using it as an opportunity to scumread someone.
Points and moments that he’s bringing up that feel fair read wise and I feel like he’s trying to actually get reads on players.
Trochilidae - I mean reading their iso they just seem fine to me? Mostly good looking solving and analyzation. That’s pretty much it.
Pigeonnyc - Originally puts vote on Leaf then bounces, but adds a weird “I’m getting wagoned D1” post right after. I kinda just saw what he was reacting to, so the context might be off key?
Odd self awareness on putting Leaf on L-1 while scumreading Magnus but I think I can find that positive.
Eli - Do nothing and leave.
Gorta - 5 posts and most of it was reacting to Leafia having 5 votes.
Magnus - Another person that puts vote on the Leaf wagon and leaves, said in the post that he didn’t have enough time to give the game justice before voting lead wagon, then comes back to say he had actually read the game to that point and thought he needed to make a move immediately despite the fact that there were still about 40 hours left in the day phase…and said that voting Leaf who had a big wagon on her was a placeholder.
Cloned - He initially townreads me off of my reasoning to vote Leafia, then proceeds to scumread me after for an apparent reaction test and tries to lump me with Professor for coming to my aid. Don’t get what happened with him townreading me initially. Not a good look.
Also going to iso Leafia later because she has the biggest iso and I need a moment because I’m fucking tired.