I believe I understand the source of the conflict now. Chloe seems to prefer trying to the game today over an “optimal” lylo, while you desire the opposite. neither is wrong to me, but I now see where the clash started.
obviously LBW and Kiiruma
I’m mildly concerned that you think, at any point in the game, we have been tunneled on you
-a
Why? 
I would like to hear them, even if it’s speculation.
-S
Tbh. I think this might be what triggered it then?
Might?
As in curent chain of events, that is.
Like there was something about you pushing agenda on us. Related to that only we would do this night kill.
I think they were ready to reevaluate before that?
You probably know more than me about it anyway.
Well, either way. It escalated so it needs to deescalate before LyLo.
Look, I’m working with what information I have.
Take it as a look into Dum’s head. In a weird way.
Well
Fair where is fair
Idrc as a slot has been in my PoE since D1, although for most of D1 & D2 it was mainly due to a lack of content rather than actively bad content
1 Like
-Aelin
Mrrr
No
I’m going to leave it alone for the moment
-a
1 Like
I really don’t think what I did day 1 was lack of content.
It’s mostly that we also have different vision of what content is.
so, what is everyone thinking of LBW’s TSP interactions post?
-S
@idrc I need time to think about the situation and things honestly. I’m too exhausted after shopping to do it tonight, but I’ll do it first thing tomorrow. Good ni GB ht everyone. Yawns
Well
Yes, but actually no
I’m well aware of your D1 philosophy
I just happen to dislike it
-a
It sure was a lot of words that I didn’t read 
-a
Like
I saw them
But they meant very little to me
The numbers meant very little to me
I skimmed the quotes and they meant very little to me
-a
1 Like
*Good night
LIke, I found the vig, I communicated with them in behind-the-lines text.
I offered them a fallback rope which even tho I pointed at it later, they refused to take for some reason.
I guess it was smart becouse they would be killed N2 anyway after that. Maybe.
Then at EoD I was saying that reasoning is flat and regardless of if you are voting town or scum, it’s missing a lot of potential reads and… people just creating stupid stuff in the end, by not consulting it with their partner.
Actually… touche.
We did kind of the same, now that I think about it.
Either way, you don’t need to hunt scum to influence the game.
And I think that part was proven enough of times. But that’s also where our different definition of content comes from.
Issue is - you saw Dum’s day 1.
I think they stopped 2 lynches day 1 by calling them “Feeling like misslynch”?
Actually, I need to go back and see who was it at.
And while you dislike the philosophy about different player types, they also weer playing clearly by trying to perceive thread in a whole, instead of finding exact scums.
I don’t think yours “no content” really works well for players who try to play game as a whole.
Becouse if you go post-by-post, you obviously can go analyzing posts right away.
Meanwhile you need OTHER people to actually create content first if you got for a bigger picture.
this is plain rude and not accurate. That would be toxic if i was running arround explicitly calling peoplr bad
What i did was poke fun and psycho for having 3/3 wolfes in town core
And dont pretend you wouldnt be mad in my position, if you got 2/3 day 1 and town proceeded to not kill the wolfes you would be mad too
-Dum
(sorry eevee, i know i should be quiet but this is crossing the line)