I recommend Chomps.
1 Like
Also, if you guys all trust me to be town, I can use Strawberry so we get 5 votes total instead of 4, so less chance for a tie? Iām also fine with Zone and Leafia using Strawberry instead of me. I think 1 strawberry 3 chocolates is good
2 Likes
Iām not altogether sure what logic you think Iām saying, but Iāll take your word for it for the sake of not inciting needless infighting.
3 Likes
This is a micro optimization. Itās not a big deal if people donāt trust the use of a strawberry, we donāt have to do it then
1 Like
Good idea. Iām fine with any of the three using strawberry too.
1 Like
My choices would be the same: [Zone, Chomps, tutuu, Leafia].
I do pity the Town members outside this towncore though. We -us four; maybe five- are the group of Town that are the most likely to be Town, therefore we are the safest members to be Chocolates. However, this forces other Town members to stay as Vanilla. I donāt know. It feels unfair to me even though this is the most optimal route to progress and victory.
Likeā¦ If we are going to stay as Chocolate all-game anyway, then we might as well become Strawberry, no? Itās not as if anything would change if we are to tie the votes.
2 Likes
I think keeping the vote counter at odd instead of even is better but this is just a hunch I think it might require like a mathematical analysis? We can do 3 strawberries 1 chocolate to keep it odd?
1 Like
I donāt think it matters which we do, but I think keeping the votes for protection odd is the best idea.
1 Like
I think this pity isnāt needed, if weāre serious about playing some competitive mafia on FoL - this is just business, itās not personal that weāre excluding them. And people shouldnāt feel bad about it because we share the common goal of winning, weāre doing it to win. If a person were to feel upset that they get to click less buttons than others then they just arenāt cut out to play forum mafia at a ~somewhat~ competitive level, imo 
2 Likes
Agreed.
1 Like
Okay, so, I think weāre in agreement for:
Tutuu, Leafia, Zone - Strawberry N2
Chomps - Chocolate N2
Everyone else - Vanilla N2
If anyone objects letās hear it
1 Like
Iām fine with that.
1 Like
Marluna was killed above everyone else for twofold reasons; she was the very first to callout Hippo for anything, namely obfuscating usefulness for anybody who wasnāt readily reading the thread altogether thoroughly, and also potentially as accord to Potatoās perception of a townslip. The fact that others disagreed over this front swings in her favour as it means w!Potato couldāve dropped it with all chances of everyone being the Neapolitan being relatively equal, whereas the alternative of an evil caring about v!Potatoās judgment is less forgettable.
2 Likes
Heading out for now as well. 
1 Like
Maybe I was wrong to assume the wolves would strongman me N1 even if Iām correct on childe. Maybe they need it for later? I have no idea how it is to play this from their PoVs. They always have an anti-cop tool. But maybe then they just donāt wanna deal with an immortal doctor? I dunno. I donāt see myself voting anyone but childe today barring something really large happening
I am confirmation biasing. But the fact that Hippo was wagon from start to finish with little resistance signals towards a wolf team that had no thread control. glares at childe
2 Likes
The evil team killed Marluna. They werenāt looking for top poster kills they were looking for the Neapolitan without the field of players who were nonetheless townread. Itās entirely plausible you werenāt considered as a nightkill at all.
2 Likes
If Iām right on childe I will kill it and thatās 2/3rds of their wolf team gone. Idk
1 Like
(This message has a specific question which could be falsely construed as rolefishing. Iām clarifying ahead that Iām writing as if from a Mafiosoās perspective, and not with the intent of having you answer it yourself.
Letās say Childe was evil alongside whomever else, it doesnāt especially matter. Why would strongmanning you immediately innately save its slot? This isnāt to say town always follows legacies, but thereād need to be some redeeming factor existing to make it worthwhile.
Does your continued existence pose more of a threat than if you die immediately, without a strongman remaining? If anything, Iād argue the opposite; Childe is just a whatever scumread because you townread everybody who posts more by default, so itās entirely reasonable for you to shift gears halfway through. Strongmanning you immediately just demonstrates fear if you were protected, which ā as explained yesterday ā is what an external observer would expect. As such, this is only worthwhile if evil believes you to be the Neapolitan; and for what itās worth, I donāt think Childe would analyse this in depth individually. In which case we have an estimate of at least one evil profile being somebody who is willing to evaluate different slots comparatively.
1 Like
Lemme do that analysis then.
WCS 4C or 4S: 0X ā [2x 2X] or [4x 1X]; 1X ā [3x 1X]; 2X ā [2x 1X].
WCS 3C1S: 0X ā [2C/1S (&1C)]; 1C ā [2C/1S]; 1S ā [3x 1C]; 1C1S ā [2x 1C].
WCS 2C2S: 0X ā [2x 1C1S] or [2C/1S/1S]; 1C ā [2x 1S (&1C)]; 1S ā [2C/1S]; 2C/S ā [2x 1S/C].
WCS 1C3S: 0X ā [3x 1S (&1C)]; 1C ā [3x 1S]; 1S ā [2x 1S (&1C)]; 1C1S ā [2x 1S].
ā¦long story short: Think less about WCS and just trust in each other that we arenāt forming a tie.
1 Like