I want to consider Chompās behavior and think if he could be town. Iām a big opponent of punishing people. I donāt like punitive decisions in mafia, I like rehabilitative. I want to combat my bias. I donāt want to give into my annoyance into dictating my decisions. I am frustrated and shocked at Chompās behavior, but just saying āOk we will policy chop you for thatā is close minded. He could still be mafia but I would like us to think about it carefully and try to work with him if heās town
I like chopping wolves in mafia. If thereās any reason to think Chomps is town, then Iāll move my vote. But if itās just so you can feel like youāre not āpunishingā them then I donāt want to move it.
Itās always towny by default, you get entitlement to be townread as town. It can be faked, but you need to decide to fake it. By default its truthful
I donāt have evidence one way or another. Me not having evidence doesnāt mean that the correct move always is to disregard it. It could be, we donāt know his alignment, but we donāt know that
What I can try to do is consider how genuine he sounds, and consider how likely would decide to try doing this as mafia. I donāt really know, I havenāt started thinking about it too much yet
He didnāt seem that entitled to being townread to me. It just looked like he was trying to convince us to stop caring about his meta. It feels pretty easy to fake. If you have a good explanation for why it couldnāt be and a good case on somebody else then Iāll consider changing vote. But I think youāre just changing vote for the sake of changing it right now.