but here is the thing, I would rather know rn 1 good person then 1 evil person
even though knowing 1 evil puts us closer to winning
Excuse me what
You’re arguing to a bunch of people playing a game where the point of the game is to make social reads, to not make social reads
Surely you see the issue with that
1 Like
Because once there is certainty in the position, we can unravel the position to find the rest of the evils
It’s giving
I know 1 good person
Im gonna cry wtf
Why u do this
Im not crazy it makes sense
Someone you could sit here and mathematically prove to me that sending two people is better and I personally wouldn’t care because I simply couldn’t win D1 like that
2 Likes
You will never win D1
Its not going to happen, anyone playing for a D1 win is out of their mind
It’s not about what is mathematically better, it’s that the chances of winning is 0 if we don’t go for 3 wolves
1 Like
Okay grandpa let’s get you to bed
Yes, who cares about winning on D1
Someone, you used mech in BotF to… lowkey out yourself as evil and mechanically sold Bionic out too even in the world you were good.
This game you’re trying to use mechanical arguments that:
1 - Knowing a good player is better than knowing an evil
2 - Choosing 2 players is better than 1
You’re refusing to do actual reads which is very important in a game like this.
Knowing evil players is our wincondition, at least in my case. IDK what is your case.
Choosing more players means we’re getting to scan the game quicker. Even if we get a 1, it’s going to help us with moving our plan on more than just choosing 2 people.
1 Like
And how dare you try to stop me the one chance I could (also iv guessed a 3 person scum team D1 before)
Like you keep saying the same thing over and over even if it made sense (it doesn’t, why would we not go for our wincon?) we obviously don’t care
1 Like
Me
1 Like