3/3 >>> 2/2 >> 2/3 > 0/3 > 0/2 >> 1/2 >>> 1/3
But like its not, the implications are far more severe
The top 4 are all /3 outcomes 
Yeah, but knowing 2 person is definetly evil is better than knowing 2 out of 3 person is evil.
1 Like
2/2 
Not all almost all
Forgets a whole word
yes 2 people is far less risky then 3
Someone 2/3 is crazy and 2 wolves out of 1 town is way better than 2 town out of (10/7) total players
Nope, because then the missing person is going to be unchecked and we’d have to waste a check on them in the future anyway in order to help clear it.
This is in comparison to having them already in the pool and being able to get to the PoE for potential teams sooner.
but we wont get 2 or 3 evils this round so the actual options are
Or wait
K
VOTE: Someone
VOTE: Frost
VOTE: Ash
1 Like
0/3 > 0/2 >> 1/2 >>> 1/3
I messed that up a bit cuz I got confused halfway it’s still rights but the logic is wrong their
1 Like
By your logic we never get 2/2 tf does it matter to you anyways
2 Likes
But Derps it’s so much likelier we find 2 wolves if we only choose 2 players! Do you not know how maths works?!
See here
Yeah, but if the 3 we are choosing are already scummy, the 2/3 won’t help that much than a 2/2, and we probably will waste an other day of checking only 2 of them in a later day.
1 Like
VOTE: Someone
VOTE: Frostwolf103
VOTE: Ash
I’m down for this trio if we’re aiming for 3 wolves.
I would go for Bionic but a few peeps have already expressed uncertainty regarding suspecting them.