good post
i have like zero information
none of us do get over it
any reason why youd wanna be king fine sir
i mean maybe but iām not really buying what youāre selling because I donāt think it could ever be a good way to decide a leader and itās also kinda self-fulfilling, like if everyone thought that way then the metagame would just shift to people winking and nudging at wanting to be the leader while hiding their nefarious intentions and thatās something people probably already do anyway. Isnāt it better to at least try to elect a good king knowing it could turn out bad than to intentionally select someone who admitted there arenāt good reasons to elect them and they just want the power?
my role is useless
especially in my hands
its not that useless in COMPETENT hands but in my hands its balls lmao
and by competent i mean
ā¦ well
thatād involve outing my role
however the specific skillsets required to handle this role I do not have
The list is unordered within groups, but yes, Marina is within my top townreads at the moment. They disappeared immediately after voting Pav, a talkative and generally townread player, and citing othersā cases on them as a reason to do so. Itās such a mixture of confidence levels that it doesnāt strike me as a wolf play.
i would do much better with straight KP
Iām not seeing king as a mechanical leader Iām seeing it as giving someone additional powers and killing power, and Iād rather not give that to someone who spoke the loudest
Tanaka has this down locked.
this do be making quite a lot of sense though
proceed on
totally
itād be more of a leader if it had the shiny golden name
I dont know why scum ever says this with no pressure on there slot
Itād be a leader if the person that stepped up as king claimed a role irrefutably town and was unconvertable. That way I could trust them. as it stands nobody has that 100% irrefutable trust factor due to the conversion mechanic, so weāre settling with second best
Unconvertable before they had stepped*