No I did vote it just a moment ago
Iâd agree with either of those.
I assume weâre treating either Babel or Eliza who disrupt the vote as a wolfclaim.
We may mislunch the other person but we get a soft clear out of Marl, and then the other person is outed for the next Day?
That is correct. Whoever remove that vote in last five minutes
So, if this lynches a wolf, then I think we are in a good spot, while if it doesnât, then I think we are back at square1
Hopefully information comes along in the night that helps solve slots but knowing Arete I know that wonât be the case and I suspect that the poe will be four people instead of five people tomorrow
If I am going to be honest I would not be surprised if Babel was a mechanic and whoever owns it does not want to put in the effort.
No?
Itâs always optimal to vote for the other person even if it disrupts marl ability
they said this about kyubey but kyubey did not appreciate these lies about the slot
he literally joined the game
One person has to pick Eliza or you know, could self-vote
eliza and babel have to be voting eachother or they can shake the tie 7 seconds from eod
readlist:
town:
me.
townlean:
app - similar to prophâs reasonings to townread him, it looks like heâs solving and he brings up relatively good points
nulltown (aka the "theyâre doing stuff, but i think its not really ai)
Proph (i want to read this but every post of his is a paragraph long and im lazy)
Litten
Mil?
Ici?
Marl?
The Null Pit.
Silviu
Frost
Leafia
Eliza
Kiiruma
Maria
Scumlean:
Lucky
aka:
can yâall be readable pls
Youâre each otherâs father. How do you not know this?
Idk, if Iâm the town in (Babel/Eliza), then Iâm not voting for the chance to potentially clear Marl and potentially be an IC.
While if youâre the wolf in that group you probably snipe the other person seconds prior to deadline to get the mislunch, but at the same time you outed yourself as wolf and softcleared Marl.
So I donât see how itâs optimal for the town in that grouping to snipe vote.
Well, if weâre being pedantic. Marl is not clear. If the wagons are v/v, then that simply gives off correct information, if the wagons are w/v then Marl either gives correct information of the villager as being a villager, or has a fake clear on a wolf. While if the wagons are w/w then it is Marl clearing another wolf.
The main takeaway is that the person who survives should likely be trusted if a villager dies. I do think Marl claimed in a villagery way but the claim inherently does not say anything about his alignment in my opinion.
25 minutes and thereâs not two wagons tied up by one less vote on Eliza
If it doesnât hit a w we get a clear on the other person
Nobody is going to NK Eliza or babel anytime soon and this could force them to later on
eliza sent a like
If both are villagers, Litten has a 50% chance of death too.
itâs optimal because
- marl could be lying
- because he could be lying, you do not know if you are safe or if the other person would be cleared if you die as a v
- you know you are a v
- you donât know the other persons alignment