What do u mean?
Meh, Osie has switched his wincons to that since a while now, don’t think this game in particular has any meaning
Neutral cult leader, was surprised it worked tbh
Nope
…we are? News to me
Just said their role
Hmm weird that it’s the complete opposite of my anti vig role, where I specifically had to target a post with the claim itself
It was not explained i just guessed
Yes, probably, though probably just the 1st layer I would guess.
Yes, but I didn’t really know how the alignment difference worked for sure. Like if it was just those starting roles or core roles or whatever. From what I’ve learned since, it sounds like just starting roles. And I didn’t know exactly how all the various factions worked and exactly which factions were against each other.
Well, when you 1st talked about the effect as poison, I was very confused. I assumed either you were hiding what happened because you were possibly scum. Or that somehow you are told that you can’t reveal what happened. It doesn’t say that in my rolecard, but it possibly worked that way.
And when you still didn’t say anything when SeonRichard mentioned the letter, I was still confused. And I wouldn’t tell much from how TM simply mentioned the letter. If they had opened it, then I would assume for sure he wasn’t W/W with you.
But now that you’ve finally revealed everything, and the way in which you explained in a long detailed post, makes me feel confident that you are good (as far as you know).
Yes, true, as far as my theory being wrong based off wrong data. However, he was directing the comment on the chart itself and not the theory.
If it was just the theory, then it was simply that SpectatoChat’s alignment change directly contradicted my theory. But he talked about the chart being massively wrong and not knowing where to start like there were multiple ways in which it was wrong all over and in a complicated way.
And even if it was just this one time, then I wouldn’t think much of it since it could be mixed together about the chart and theory discussion. However, he used the term massively the 2nd time in a context much later where it was just about the chart itself.
Haha, I got confused between Arctic’s pfp and TreeReaper’s. I thought TreeReaper was commenting. 
Anyway, I guess all the “he” should be “you”
I replied to TreeReaper on this a little earlier, so you’ll probably see that
I’m confused at what you are getting at. The claimvig was an item given to me at a later point. I guess as part of that revealed rule. And even after I got it, I didn’t want to claim it until it could actually be used obviously. So I mentioned it at the point when we were in discussion about beancat and thinking it didn’t sound good to keep a Cult leader around.
Yeah, I’m still not convinced it actually worked
At first, I tried just submitting an action to claimvig beancat. Then I was asked to say as what. So then I just submitted the role Neutral Cult Leader and that was accepted.
Well, but the claimvig is just for using to vig someone with a true claim. So it just has to match up the role names. But I believe yours was about vigging someone who is faking a claim, right? So I can see how you have to point out exactly where they are faking.
I never particularly liked many of the arguments Arctic has set forth this game, I don’t really agree with you not claiming the big shot is a point against u, but I can say that the vig itself was not activated after the rule reveal since I got mine rather early before it was revealed