This rulebook looks like Osie made some sort of constitution for this game.
actually, your slot is another good option to kill since s&k said the hosts told them to vote you
plus not much of value would be lost anyway
hey atnoname remember when u shot my nightkill targets as a vig lolol
The host has no rights anyways.
?
Did I? I don’t remember shooting anything.
i don’t know tbh
their claim about the hood seemed kinda real, but i still think they lied about the first thing
meh i’d feel bad about killing whysper actually
if we want to see what happens by killing via majority we should kill s&k
(not much of value would be lost)
Is there any specific reason you think so?
I think that S&K have been lying too, hence my vote on the slot.
But I’ll not answer for whoever is posting for TownMisleaders
U don’t read FoL games u either stick to real-time or you iso
Also welcome to discourse, vote with /vote “name”
Bold or color for the hosts to find it, as well as ping them
Since that was literally their second (first on-topic) post, I am seriously unsure why people think they were lying
Voting format here can be whatever as long as you link the post in the voting thread. Votes that are not linked in the voting thread will not be counted. (Not a hidden rule.)
Read how lunching someone works, it is explained in the VC
What do u mean the voting thread?
It’s not like they were the first to claim to have chosen the “or” option; I think it was established pretty early on that this was a thing?
So it’s definitely not that
But I just don’t see why
i hail from epicmafia, I have mastered the art of being up to date in multiple thousand post days >:)
This is the current majority system, it has also changed several times if u read the VCs
osie wont let me have anything so i want to kill lukando out of spite
also
fuck
fuck
fuck
ass
katze
Yeah, the 66% is kinda off due to the host post above getting an edit between me reading and me posting that.
…and i potentially forgot that EOD would kill off people too if 50+% voted
But the underlying idea of “we have no clue what’s going on, is it really a good idea to lynch somebody?” Vs. “We should prolly lynch somebody just in case something happens” turning into a discussion is still vaguely valid… I think