So a guy keeps saying things that implies that he’s solving as he’s being wagoned.
But when asking for what he thinks of certain player’s alignments to give him an opportunity to fight this off and avoid being misyeeted, he ignores it, and responds to someone else while saying next to nothing to move the game forward?
How is that an unnatural conclusion?
i can unfortunately confirm that sda loses to some tree nuts, particularly cashews, in both tests of attrition and concentration
Also have you seen what my anti spew looks like??
My goal as a wolf is to cause chaos if I think I’m going down
Lmao
Lmao
I think it’s a natural conclusion to draw. do you think it’s a reach instead of “unnatural”??
If I can ask, why specifically cashews?
havent run tests on any other types
Ahh I see. Understandable enough
Now you’re just open wolfing.
I fell asleep at my desk
I don’t really have a read on them cuz all I really remember from them is SOD shitposting
But I’m still pretty confident lucky is villager so like
Refer to above post
So your plan of attack is go after the guy that’s trying to help you if you’re town and try to get an actual wolf if you think the wagons are T/T?
That’s a phenomenal strategy.
What
Did I stutter in text format?
I think I’m fine with voting Derps here because I’m not voting Zone today, I do remember reading some mildly towny things from Seth (I could be getting played, but still), and I’m too tired to commit to ISOing Aelin
I can’t process what the fuck you’re referring to their lmao
CFD to brad with me and hippo
Add some spice to your life