I cant think back to your review, so cant say man your bad or good, but apologies if we didn’t respond to tell you no. That happened a lot on old site where both sides would just stop messaging about it, so they kinda didn’t go no where.
3 Likes
I don’t exactly remember it but something along the lines of infinite lynches or a LOT of lynches idk
1 Like
That’s it! I remember it now. The dreaming god could wind up with infinite lynches.
2 Likes
Wait this isnt untrusted?
1 Like
funny thing is iirc it was originally a test for eevee by osie and eevee needed help figuring it out
I can’t believe they actually used it for their official review process
I remember when eevee was discussing it with us in team polish lmao
2 Likes
The setup should never step foot anywhere near anyone ever again
I don’t know how they expected people to manage to find that; it went entirely over my head anyway
I confess that I did actually like the hyper-competitive vanilla setup but it’s just not suited for FoL
It’s a setup you’d pose to a reviewer on like a more competitive mafia scene
2 Likes
This would basically just turn it into a ‘how well do you know site history’ test which wouldn’t really capture the skills we’re trying to measure – remembering ‘hey, the Lying Darkness, that ended a game on day 1 once’ doesn’t really tell us how well you’ll do at evaluating novel setups
3 Likes
Yeah like…the setups osie had were like if you were trying to give someone a professional setup review test
Which, while it could be suited to know if people are really good at it, chances are if a reviewer sees a setup like that, they know instantly to go to another more experienced reviewer and ask them for help
(also ftr that setup was mainly used to evaluate people’s process, not just to see ‘oh did you get the right answer’ – it’s totally possible to ‘pass’ without finding the exact breaking interaction if your process is otherwise good)
2 Likes
Would it be a bad idea to like
Give the trial reviewers like… test runs on queued setups to see if they’re qualified?
or do you already do that
1 Like
You would obviously not use lying darkness it’s very clear what the fault in that was
You could even source setups from other websites if you wanted
Or create your own that would actually run on FoL
Just because it’s run in the site history doesn’t mean it’s bad as a question candidate
Asking people what was wrong with WoW:BfA for example wouldn’t be a terrible question
2 Likes
Thats if they get past a certain point
1 Like
you must throw them into the pits of hell of bastard setups that have over 7000 mechanics first before you can truly gauge whether someone is fit to be a reviewer
1 Like
Aye
Thought they did at some point
So what you’re saying is
The trial reviewers must review next year’s FAM
1 Like
I don’t know why anyone would want to be a reviewer it sucks
The way it is now, reviewers are required to already have the skills to review setups
I think it’d be better if we were to move towards more of an apprenticeship mentality than a sink or swim mentality
3 Likes
Imagine being expected to make setups that arent shit
2 Likes
I was technically a reviewer once
im retired
1 Like
I ran them all on other sites.