Nope. There are two kills maximum unlocked with 4 and 5 Sith policies.
Or we can avoid that mess by ensuring 5 Jedi policies are on the board.
implying, we will get 5 jedi policies before seeing a sith policy.
Who will win? Democratic democracy or fascist imperalism?
The 1st two Sith Policies aren’t too bad because the investigation power can setup conflicts and that is good for Jedi info wise. It’s 3 Sith policies which is when the game becomes difficult for Jedi, because the Sith unlock a new win condition once at least 3 Sith policies are on the board.
I love how one refers to the jedi in third person and the other in first person plural
You don’t, yet
I mean the whole picking jedi and sith just becomes rng and its why I stopped talking about mech except for gun.
the gun and me getting it is inevitable one way or the other.
I’m thinking Jarek is probably not Palpatine for now, as my thinking is that if they were Palpatine they wouldn’t be so vocal in wanting to be Chancellor at such an early stage.
next read, anyone who act wolfy will be wolf
In before 5 Jedi policies are on the board before any Sith policies are played.
that would require identifying almost all of the Jedi which by FoL standard is impossible.
probably about 20
give or take
usually with 5-7 ppl tho
Perhaps, yet this is a new game. Anything can happen.
That’s how non-hitlers work?
look yall
it’s simple
if you’re jedi you pick jedi
the powers aren’t worth it since it’s the vice chair who uses it not the chancellor
and realistically the powers are gonna show up naturally
1 Like
As a rule, the Vice Chair/President is more important than the Chancellor.
That’s a little different in HZ, as if you put Hitler/Palpatine as Chancellor that’s game over.
innit
yeah
but my point is that this discussion about investigation and stuff isn’t necessary
it’ll happen anyways, no need to throw to get power