That’s fair, but I don’t think anyone evil gains anything from pushing to be chancellor given that there are more sith policies than jedi policies in the deck by default, and if they’re super pushy about getting chancellor and then a sith policy gets enacted, it’s not gonna pay off in the long run
Soo.
- Whysper (the first in the list) becomes vice chair.
- Whysper needs to choose a chancellor.
- We vote to pass or not pass.
- Whysper after having a successful government needs to discard a card and then the chancellor needs to pick one of the 2 remaining cards.
- (In what situation would be appropriate for a jedi chancellor to pass an evil card?)
- The policy passes on the board.
- (How would an evil player lie in this position?)
- Veto power is used to discard all cards, unlocked when there’s 5 sith cards on the board.
- The next in list gets elected.
- Repeat
I would imagine that a Jedi VC would prefer to force a blue if possible.
So… everyone selecting a sith card means they’re evil?
It’s possible to have double sith policies but at least right now I’d say it’s very unlikely
Not necessarily, they can be Jedi who had the bad luck to have 3 reds.
Lying about policies are allowed, but I imagine here that both the vice and the chancellor needs to be the same alignment for it to work or not make the lie of “Hey guys I’m passing this blue card.” and then it shows a sith card.
I think that’s more likely to happen if VC/Chancellor are both Sith for reasons.
Rn I should go to bed.
Yeah I’m thinking they are probably either someone out of place or someone hiding and trying to let their other sith take charge.
Surely palpatine works as simple as stereotypes?
Yeah we don’t have to worry about suspecting “people pushing for chancellor” until after 3 sith policies have past (hopefully it doesn’t reach that point) but we would only be looking for 1 player and that being Palpatine.
As much as I’m all about “Pick the Jedi cards!” It is also possible we can ONLY choose Sith if Sith is our only 3 options at the time.
Jedi is 5 and Sith is 11 I think.
Lying about policies are allowed, but I imagine here that both the vice and the chancellor needs to be the same alignment for it to work or not make the lie of “Hey guys I’m passing this blue card.” and then it shows a sith card.
I feel like that’s something AT no name would do.
He really wants that assassination.
This will sound very funny in retro if he’s a chicken with electric powers.
RN though I’m probably picking Wazza as chancellor.
Wouldn’t say no to giving it to Jarek either.
Why Wazza or Jarek?
CRichard/Atlas boom instant scum
I agreed with them on the sus of CRichard in that moment.
I liked the interaction I had with Jarek and I’m willing to go there because of it.
Wazza very deadly player in general per usual
What about me?