oh it had to do with policies and not players
The fact that Marluna and Lucky both voted no is kind of funny, but doesnât really strike me as that suspicious? If anything, doesnât it imply they arenât both sith?
How does it imply that? Itâs not like the sith have a secret chat all to themselves.
But wouldnât it be more likely for at least one of them to vote âyesâ if theyâre both sith, since it would make it easier for them to pass a sith policy in that case? Or am I misunderstanding how the game works?
Actually nvm what am I saying, if theyâre the only two who vote No anyway, it doesnât matter because theyâre still the government. It would really only have given us info on them if a third player had also voted No.
Can you tell Iâm sleep deprived lol
They donât know what the other is voting regardless of their alignment and their vote doesnât affect the policy that gets passed. The only thing that does is the cards they receive.
@CRichardFortressLies itâs this thread you announce it not my DMâs.
Anyway, Double Sâs. Iâll await on Richard to say anything further.
If thatâs the case there is what 6 Sith in deck?
That means there theoretically is only 1 left since Mist claimed 2 I believe.
Oh wait thereâs 11?
Ah I was getting it mixed up my bad.
Ok so Iâm that case there should be 5 Jedi Policies and 6 Sith Policies left in the deck.
Meaning there theoretically should be 2 Jedi Policies passing next.
Since Leafia is next in line I believe.
No. Thereâs 11 soth policies in all in the deck and 6 jedi policies.
No. You investigate you or rge next Vice Vhchair.
Oh wait. I am the next vice chair.
So investigate either me or Lucky. Either one is acceptable. Iâd prefer to be investigated myself honestly.