Baker was heavily trying to imply Gambler Pixie in whisper with me and Magnus and in public later
my fullclaim was in there
You donāt claim Pixie as Pixie
Atlas how about you?
no i wasnt
Itās difficult when those lies actively support alternative worlds, yeah.
i believed similarly, yes
Magnus were they trying to imply Gambler Pixie
Look itās not a debate about them being a townsfolk
Itās about whether they are exactly mutant
And if they are just do absolutely nothing and keep claiming whatever you are, donāt break madness
Will be going to sleep soon
Good night
i have a compounding migraine
so iāll describe this later
if l.una or baker wants to transcribe the whisper and mildly change the words first they can
My braces will cease to exist
Iāve ascended from nerd emoji
I donāt see how your fakeclaim would matter to how Baker softclaimed evil, unless they said something like āIām so happy I murdered that roleā.
Did you not claim to them on D1?
magnus asked if i had sentry written in my card, i said i cant answer that. i gave 3 claims and we discussed about puzzlemaster and courtier
Yes they were. Or at least thatās what I had them marked as.
Baker explicitly gave me a 3f3 which had Courtier and did not have Pixie in it.
I donāt need the whisper transcribed. I just want a synopsis.
I had them marked as Gambler alone because I didnāt know about the competing claim but I think you two implied you did? It was Gambler Pixie zone
Pixie or Gambler, to be clear.
You donāt claim Pixie as Pixie