compromise: jarek wins and everybody else loses (including apo)
So hereās the thing.
I didnāt bleed anyone on Day 3 because I wanted to leave it open whether someone was turned at all, and also because I was expecting to become the Visionary.
On Day 4, Jarek claimed bled so I couldnāt out his lie.
After that it didnāt matter.
Day 5 the bled mattered only in this niche scenario that you probably couldnāt have known about bd king losing a 1 v 1 unless a bleed happened
I just dislike the idea that my entire contribution this game was watching my entire team die, and then being told āoh you can win if the last gets to the end!ā and then I lose at the end in a fucking 1v1 because Iām apparently a pansy and canāt handle 1 person
The bleed is a two-day death.
yes im not making fun of you im just saying itd be funny if everybody except you just lost
The ship has sailed for not taking this game seriously
That king would have been alive for more than two days
I know I know sorry
The game still wouldāve ended in our loss.
Why? Eliza ruled because the BD canāt kill, unseen wins, but the BD king can kill by being patient
Because the difference is that three people just died and the Mortician was alive.
the rationale for ānobody can kill eachother [so town wins]ā would probably be different if the town in the 1v1 was bleeding to death
either way magnus knowing this and acting accordingly is not exactly reasonable i think (not actually sure how much they knew from their position)
Because I assumed the game would just end once Plague died.
The last time BD won as informed minority had the converter as widely trusted till the end.
basically this
So did I
I canāt die from any of the unseen I canāt be voted and thereās absolutely nothing they can do to me
Why do I kill myself as if I canāt just do whatever I want
good wins ties